2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural mechanisms of brain–computer interface control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
110
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in healthy volunteers and patients with stroke show that motor imagery results in similar parietofrontal functional network interactions to those observed for execution of hand motor tasks (Sharma et al, 2009a;Gao et al, 2010). Moreover, the ability of healthy volunteers to acquire volitional control of sensorimotor rhythm modulation appears to be related to the degree that the constituent regions of this network are recruited by the motor imagery strategy used (Halder et al, 2011). Thus, it would be reasonable to expect that volitional control of neural activity through operant conditioning using motor imagery would relate to architectural features of this network.…”
Section: Global Functional Network Cost-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Studies in healthy volunteers and patients with stroke show that motor imagery results in similar parietofrontal functional network interactions to those observed for execution of hand motor tasks (Sharma et al, 2009a;Gao et al, 2010). Moreover, the ability of healthy volunteers to acquire volitional control of sensorimotor rhythm modulation appears to be related to the degree that the constituent regions of this network are recruited by the motor imagery strategy used (Halder et al, 2011). Thus, it would be reasonable to expect that volitional control of neural activity through operant conditioning using motor imagery would relate to architectural features of this network.…”
Section: Global Functional Network Cost-efficiencymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Motor imagery is defined as the mental simulation of a kinesthetic movement (Decety and Inqvar, 1990;Neuper et al, 2005). Signal processing algorithms, individual users' characteristics, such as psychosocial and physiological parameters (e.g., fine motor skills) or brain structures, can predict performances for SMR-based BCIs Halder et al, 2011Halder et al, , 2013Hammer et al, 2011;Randolph, 2012). Besides these factors, feedback is a necessary feature for initial learning of the BCI skill (Brown, 1970;Kuhlman, 1978;McFarland et al, 1998;Wolpaw et al, 1991Wolpaw et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focus on inter-subject variability from a physiological [2][3][4][5][6], anatomical [7,8], or psychological [9,10] perspectives. Although precise distinction between user-related and system-related causes of performance variations may not be simple [11], these studies provide a better understanding of these causes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%