2004
DOI: 10.1175/2057.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Network Classifiers for Local Wind Prediction

Abstract: This paper evaluates the quality of neural network classifiers for wind speed and wind gust prediction with prediction lead times between +1 and +24 h. The predictions were realized based on local time series and model data. The selection of appropriate input features was initiated by time series analysis and completed by empirical comparison of neural network classifiers trained on several choices of input features. The selected input features involved day time, yearday, features from a single wind observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, short-range forecasts have utilized on-site observations with various persistence based statistical forecast models, including autoregressive time series techniques (Brown, Katz and Murphy 1984) and neural network methodologies (Kretzschmar, Eckert, Cattani and Eggimann 2004). Giebel (2003) surveys the literature on short-range wind speed and wind power forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, short-range forecasts have utilized on-site observations with various persistence based statistical forecast models, including autoregressive time series techniques (Brown, Katz and Murphy 1984) and neural network methodologies (Kretzschmar, Eckert, Cattani and Eggimann 2004). Giebel (2003) surveys the literature on short-range wind speed and wind power forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the space-time dependencies of wind are known to be complex, and a localized understanding of this structure may provide more targeted information to improve forecasts. A noted difficulty in characterizing the spatial dependence among many locations is that the location that is upwind of the site of interest changes with the wind direction, so no single off-site location will have a consistently high correlation with the prediction site (Kretzschmar et al 2004). However, with the regimes identified by the GMM( k ) method, we can characterize the spatial correlation among sites within each regime and have demonstrated with the case study that correlations can be different when restricting computations to observations within a regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the Box-Jenkins methodology (Box and Jenkins, 1976) -for examples of application see Brown et al (1984); Sfetsos (2000); • spectral analysis based methods -see, for example, Tilley and McBean (1973); Trivikrama et al (1976); Ghil et al (2002), and, • ANN methods -see for example Sfetsos (2000); Kretzschamar et al (2004); Potter and Negnevitsky (2006).…”
Section: Statistical Methods and Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%