2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Reflectance for Shape Recovery with Shadow Handling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to deal with depth discontinuities [25]. It is desirable to obtain a more complete scene reconstruction (including both visible and invisible parts) from single-view images.…”
Section: (B)) Besides Methods Relying On Surface Normal Representatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…to deal with depth discontinuities [25]. It is desirable to obtain a more complete scene reconstruction (including both visible and invisible parts) from single-view images.…”
Section: (B)) Besides Methods Relying On Surface Normal Representatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following existing nearfield photometric stereo methods [36,46], we assume a calibrated perspective camera and known point light positions. Instead of representing the visible surface with a normal / depth map like others [25,36,46], we adopt a 3D neural field representation [3,37,41] to describe the 3D scene.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, such a model restricts methods' performance on objects with more general (e.g., anisotropic) materials, while modeling general reflectance is challenging due to extra unknowns, which eventually make UPS intractable. Other works (e.g., [25,56,57]) notice the benefits of the shadow cues in utilizing global shape-light information to solve PS/UPS because the shadow reflects the interaction of shape and light [24,59]. However, these methods either fail to exploit the shadow cues due to the lack of a differentiable path from the shadow to the concerned unknowns like shape [25], or the shadow cues have limited effects on the visible shape reconstruction due to the implicit shape representation [56,57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%