Neural responses to children’s faces: Test–retest reliability of structural and functional MRI

Abstract

Introduction Functional MRI (fMRI) is commonly used to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying psychological processes and behavioral responses. However, to draw well‐founded conclusions from fMRI studies, more research on the reliability of fMRI is needed. Methods We invited a sample of 41 female students to participate in two identical fMRI sessions, separated by 5 weeks on average. To investigate the potential effect of left‐handedness on the stability of neural activity, we oversampled left‐handed participants ( N = 20). Inside the scanner, we presented photographs of familiar and unfamiliar children's faces preceded by neutral and threatening primes to the participants. We calculated intraclass correlations (ICCs) to investigate the test–retest reliability of peak activity in areas that showed significant activity during the first session (primary visual cortex, fusiform face area, inferior frontal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus). In addition, we examined how many trials were needed to reliably measure the effects. Results Across all participants, only fusiform face area activity in response to faces showed good test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.71). All other test–retest reliabilities were low (0.01 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.35). Reliabilities varied only slightly with increasing numbers of trials, with no consistent increase in ICCs. Test–retest reliabilities for left‐handed participants (0.28 ≤ ICC ≤0.66) were generally somewhat higher than for right‐handed participants (−0.13 ≤ ICC ≤0.75), but not statistically significant. Conclusion Our study shows good test–retest reliability for fusiform facer area activity in response to faces, but low test–retest reliability for other contrasts and areas.

Internal reliability of blame-related functional MRI measures in major depressive disorder

“…Using different modelling approaches, we showed fair reliability for simple fMRI measures related to self-blame, but poor reliability for more complex measures. Our findings corroborate previous reports that reliability appears to diminish with increasing model complexity, especially when using contrasts or difference scores ( Hedge et al, 2018 , Gorgolewski et al, 2013 , Fröhner et al, 2019 , Heckendorf et al, 2019 ). Infantolino and colleagues showed that, when two conditions are highly correlated in an individual, subtraction-based difference scores will invariably remove shared variance which is relevant to the internal consistency of the task ( Infantolino et al, 2018 ).…”

Brain activity and love-withdrawal moderate effects of suggested kinship on negative appraisals.

“…For the third participant, fMRI data of the first 156 trials (67% of the task) of Session 2 were available. As we obtained similar reliability of FFA activity in the contrast faces versus scrambled stimuli in previous analyses (see Heckendorf et al, 2018). We included this participant’s FFA activity during the available trials in the analyses.…”

“…Details concerning MRI image acquisition and fMRI processing and analysis, along with results (observed activation as well as reliability of activity) have been reported elsewhere (Heckendorf et al, 2016; Heckendorf, Bakermans-Kranenburg, Van IJzendoorn, & Huffmeijer, 2018). We analyzed the fMRI data with FSL (FMRIB’s Software Library), FEAT (FMRI Expert Analysis Tool) Version 5.0.4, part of Jenkinson, Beckmann, Behrens, Woolrich, and Smith (2012), and Smith et al (2004).…”

“…We recently found that young adults' experiences with parental love-withdrawal during childhood were related to face processing. Parental lovewithdrawal was related to increased brain activity in face processing areas (i.e., infero-lateral occipital cortex and fusiform areas) in response to children's faces that resembled their own compared with children's faces that did not resemble their own face (Heckendorf, Huffmeijer, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & Van IJzendoorn, 2016). Thus, experiences of love-withdrawal were related to enhanced neural differentiation between children's faces that resembled the participants' faces and children's faces that did not.…”

Description, prediction and causation: Methodological challenges of studying child and adolescent development

“…It has been argued that the lack of replicability of empirical results may well be rooted in the fact that experiments tend to focus on a very narrow part of the method space, holding as many factors fixed as possible ( Baribault et al, 2018 ; Elliott et al, 2020 ; Heckendorf et al, 2019 ). To counter this problem, Baribault et al (2018) propose radical randomization , which consists of a combination of many micro-experiments that differ from each other in particular facets—such as the exact stimuli ( t ), or setting ( s )—that could serve as moderators of the treatment effect.…”