2015
DOI: 10.1111/adb.12314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural substrates of cue reactivity: association with treatment outcomes and relapse

Abstract: Given the strong evidence for neurological alterations at the basis of drug dependence, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) represents an important tool in the clinical neuroscience of addiction. fMRI cue-reactivity paradigms represent an ideal platform to probe the involvement of neurobiological pathways subserving the reward/motivation system in addiction and potentially offer a translational mechanism by which interventions and behavioral predictions can be tested. Thus, this review summarizes the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
166
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(139 reference statements)
5
166
1
Order By: Relevance
“…fMRI cue-reactivity paradigms represent an ideal platform to probe the involvement of neurobiological pathways subserving the incentive salience system in addiction (Courtney et al, 2016;Ray et al, in press). Given that BOLD measures of drug cue-reactivity have been shown to predict relapse propensity in treatment seeking patients (eg, Beck et al, 2012;Kosten et al, 2006;Schacht et al, 2013b), the investigation of neurochemical systems that alter BOLD measures of cue-reactivity has the potential to improve real-world clinical outcomes in addiction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fMRI cue-reactivity paradigms represent an ideal platform to probe the involvement of neurobiological pathways subserving the incentive salience system in addiction (Courtney et al, 2016;Ray et al, in press). Given that BOLD measures of drug cue-reactivity have been shown to predict relapse propensity in treatment seeking patients (eg, Beck et al, 2012;Kosten et al, 2006;Schacht et al, 2013b), the investigation of neurochemical systems that alter BOLD measures of cue-reactivity has the potential to improve real-world clinical outcomes in addiction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants are shown drug-related cues (often pictorial) that are known to induce craving and reward-related brain activation patterns inside the fMRI. The fMRI scanner captures the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response, a measure of brain activation (e.g., Courtney et al 2016). Key brain areas that are activated in drug-users in cue reactivity paradigms are the NAc, medial PFC (mPFC), basolateral amygdala and other PFC areas (for reviews, see Courtney et al 2016;Schacht et al 2013).…”
Section: Neuroimaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fMRI scanner captures the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response, a measure of brain activation (e.g., Courtney et al 2016). Key brain areas that are activated in drug-users in cue reactivity paradigms are the NAc, medial PFC (mPFC), basolateral amygdala and other PFC areas (for reviews, see Courtney et al 2016;Schacht et al 2013). The NAc, mPFC and amygdala have been associated with bottom-up motivational aspects of cue reactivity (Barros-Loscertales et al 2011), reward processing (Koob and Volkow 2010), subjective drug craving and relapse (Beck et al 2012;Sinha 2012;Volkow et al 2004), whereas the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) is involved in top-down control over motivational reactions to drug cues in addiction (Baler and Volkow 2006;Bechara 2005;Sinha 2012).…”
Section: Neuroimaging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations