2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuraxial anesthesia in patients with multiple sclerosis – a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concern regarding associations between spinal anesthesia and MS relapses emerged almost 70 years ago. 180 Since then, prospective studies and a meta-analysis have demonstrated the safety of spinal anaesthesia in MS. 5,81,181,182 The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine states in its 2015 guidelines that epidural anesthesia is considered safer than spinal anesthesia because it does not deposit local anesthetic directly adjacent to the CNS. 183 However, choice of analgesia in labor is best left to discretion of the obstetrician and anesthesiologist in discussion with the woman.…”
Section: Obstetric Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concern regarding associations between spinal anesthesia and MS relapses emerged almost 70 years ago. 180 Since then, prospective studies and a meta-analysis have demonstrated the safety of spinal anaesthesia in MS. 5,81,181,182 The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine states in its 2015 guidelines that epidural anesthesia is considered safer than spinal anesthesia because it does not deposit local anesthetic directly adjacent to the CNS. 183 However, choice of analgesia in labor is best left to discretion of the obstetrician and anesthesiologist in discussion with the woman.…”
Section: Obstetric Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of more extensive prospective studies leads to more favourable results and an increased exposure to local analgesia/anaesthesia. 7,60,[70][71][72] Except for one study, it is unclear whether women received locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia. There is no increased risk of relapse in the PP associated with local analgesia/anaesthesia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Regional anesthesia techniques are not contraindicated; however, they are not completely safe. [13] Lower prevalence of hypotension in epidural anesthesia may be preferred instead of spinal anesthesia. [14] Kyatta et al [15] examined the association between the perioperative findings of 56 cases with MS and the anesthetic technique used and reported that they have encountered hypotension refractory to intravenous vasopressor treatment in 4 patients who received regional anesthesia in the form of spinal (n=2) and epidural anesthesia (n=2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%