1975
DOI: 10.1037/h0077034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroanatomical basis of binaural phase-difference analysis for sound localization: A comparative study.

Abstract: Four varieties of mammals whose medial superior olives range from large to none at all were tested for their ability to localize single, brief tone pips at various frequencies. Although each animal could localize high-frequency tone pips, their ability to localize middle-and low-frequency tone pips corresponded to the size of their medial superior olive (MSO). Since this latter range of frequencies is the one in which binaural phase-difference cues predominate, this anatomical-behavioral correspondence support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Species with small heads and highfrequency hearing probably do not have interaural time or phase differences in a range that would be useful for sound localization, and in some cases they appear to lack an MSO (1,3,4). However, in other cases, notably in echolocating bats, a large MSO is present despite a small head size and high-frequency hearing range (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species with small heads and highfrequency hearing probably do not have interaural time or phase differences in a range that would be useful for sound localization, and in some cases they appear to lack an MSO (1,3,4). However, in other cases, notably in echolocating bats, a large MSO is present despite a small head size and high-frequency hearing range (5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSO of mammalian species is primarily concerned with localization of sound sources emitting low frequencies (Masterton et al 1975;Heffner & Masterton, 1990). …”
Section: Msomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angles tested were 180 , 120 , 90 , 60 , 30 , 20 , 15 , 10 , and 5 . Localization performance for pure-tones and amplitude modulated tones was determined using a fixed angle of 60 separation, a relatively easy angle for this species and one that allows direct comparison with data from many other species (e.g., Masterton et al, 1975). Pure tones throughout the hearing range were used as long as they could be produced at 40-50 dB above threshold without distortion.…”
Section: E Behavioral Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%