2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2014.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobehavioral function and low-level metal exposure in adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Belgium, mean urinary cadmium mass concentrations in children and adolescents were 0.23-0.27 μg L −1 ; in adult never smokers 0.56 μg L −1 and in elderly never smokers 0.94 μg L −1 [87]. Similar values have been reported in other studies [88,95]. In the U.S., geometric mean urinary cadmium, measured in 2011-2012, was approximately 0.08 nmol mmol −1 creatinine in children and adolescents (6-19 years) and 0.22 nmol mmol −1 creatinine in adults [78].…”
Section: Cadmium In Urinesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In Belgium, mean urinary cadmium mass concentrations in children and adolescents were 0.23-0.27 μg L −1 ; in adult never smokers 0.56 μg L −1 and in elderly never smokers 0.94 μg L −1 [87]. Similar values have been reported in other studies [88,95]. In the U.S., geometric mean urinary cadmium, measured in 2011-2012, was approximately 0.08 nmol mmol −1 creatinine in children and adolescents (6-19 years) and 0.22 nmol mmol −1 creatinine in adults [78].…”
Section: Cadmium In Urinesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The validity of this assumption has now been called into question by studies showing that low-level U-Cd is strongly, if not mainly, influenced by factors unrelated to Cd body burden. One of the most challenging findings is that adolescents and young children have U-Cd values similar to, if not higher than, those of adults despite a Cd body burden that is 5–10 times lower (median values of U-Cd for most age groups of the general population are in the range of 0.2–0.4 ÎĽg/g creatinine in nonsmoking subjects) ( Chaumont et al 2013 ; Hoet et al 2013 ; Kicinski et al 2015 ). Further calling into question the reliability of U-Cd as a marker of cumulative exposure, some studies found no differences in U-Cd between never-smokers and past smokers, an unexpected observation for a biomarker supposedly reflecting the body burden of the metal ( Chaumont et al 2013 ; Ikeda et al 2005 ; Paschal et al 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies of this age group show a positive relationship even between low concentrations of lead aerosols and damage to hemopoiesis, nervous tissue, hearing, changes in neurobehavioral functions, and intellectual [ 29 ] [ 30 ] [ 31 ] [ 32 ]. Reports of blocking the bioactivity of porphyrin synthesis enzymes, impaired haem- synthesis and the development of anemia by the action of lead is found in research by de Carvalho RP et al, 2006; Zimmermann M. B. et al, 2006; Muwakkit S. et al, 2008; Rondó P. K. et al, 2011, Park S. et al, 2014 [ 33 ] [ 34 ] [ 35 ] [ 36 ] [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%