2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurodevelopmental Trajectories of Preterm Born Survivors of Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome: From Birth to 5 Years of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence closest to our estimate of 31% was reported in a study by Tosello et althat used scores derived from the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and clinical examination to arrive at a prevalence of 31.4% for children at a mean age of 37 months [23]. The proportion of children with neurodevelopmental impairment in our study was also similar to that reported from a recent study undertaken in The Netherlands, where the rate of impairment was 46% at 5 years, and impairment severity was predominantly mild-moderate [34]. The Dutch estimate arose from routine follow-up of the subgroup of child survivors born before 30 weeks' gestation or small for gestational age, so may not be generalisable to all survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence closest to our estimate of 31% was reported in a study by Tosello et althat used scores derived from the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and clinical examination to arrive at a prevalence of 31.4% for children at a mean age of 37 months [23]. The proportion of children with neurodevelopmental impairment in our study was also similar to that reported from a recent study undertaken in The Netherlands, where the rate of impairment was 46% at 5 years, and impairment severity was predominantly mild-moderate [34]. The Dutch estimate arose from routine follow-up of the subgroup of child survivors born before 30 weeks' gestation or small for gestational age, so may not be generalisable to all survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Knijnenburg et al, authors of the 2020 systematic review cited above, recognised that an important limitation of comparison between studies was the substantial difference in length of follow-up, ranging from 1 month to 10 years in the reviewed studies [24]. The review identified probable under-ascertainment of neurodevelopmental impairment in children under the age of five years, a finding supported in their subsequent local study [34]. Similarly, we found the rate of neurodevelopmental impairments in children under 5 was half that of those aged 5 and older.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, infants were assessed at a median age of 2, whereas more developmental problems become apparent only at an older age. Therefore, follow-up at least until school age is recommended [21, 22]. The low sample size precludes any analyses on the outcomes of sFGR or TTTS in MCMA twins, which is best assessed in systematic reviews and meta-analyses [23, 24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous cohort of infants being 2 years’ CA, 62% of the extremely preterm survivors did not have any impairment at 2 years’ CA 8–10. However, several studies showed that the correlation between impairment classification at 2 years of age and at middle childhood is moderate 6 11–13. At later age, the degree of disability may be more clearly defined and may be more likely to be predictive of problems that will continue into later life 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%