This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

No abstract

To determine classroom-evaluated school performance nine years after preterm birth, predicted by perinatal risk factors and neonatal brain abnormalities. Study design: Children were recruited from a consecutive cohort of 113 preterm infants (< 32 weeks' gestation), participating in a longitudinal prospective study, investigating brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome. Data on perinatal risk factors, presence of brain injury at term-equivalent age, and maternal education were collected. Information on school performance included enrollment in special (primary) education, grade repetition and school results from the nationwide standardized Dutch Pupil Monitoring System regarding reading comprehension, spelling, and mathematics. Results: Information on school enrollment was available for 87 children (77%), of whom 7 (8%) were in special primary education and 19 (22%) repeated a grade. This was significantly higher compared to national rates (p ≤ .05). Results on school performance were available for 74 children (65%) and showed clearly below average scores in reading comprehension (p = .006), spelling (p = .014) and mathematics (p < .001). Univariate analysis showed that lower performance in reading comprehension was predicted by male sex and low maternal education; spelling by male sex; and mathematics by Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, white matter injury and maternal education. In a multivariate model, male sex and maternal education were predictive for reading comprehension and white matter injury for mathematics. Conclusion: Preterm born children more often need special primary education and have higher grade repeat rates. They perform poorer on reading comprehension, spelling and mathematics. Regular follow-up remains important for preterm born children during school age.

No abstract

Objective: To investigate the rate and stability of impairments in children born preterm by assessing (1) early and school-age outcome in four developmental domains and (2) individual changes in outcome at both timepoints.Design: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study in children born in 2006–2007, &lt;32 weeks' gestation. Follow-up at 2 and 10 years of age included standardized neurological, motor, cognitive and behavioral assessments. Children were categorized as having no, mild or moderate-severe impairment in these four domains. A composite impairment score was composed and the number of domains with impairments counted. For each child, individual outcomes at both timepoints were compared.Results: Follow-up at both time-points was available in 71/113(63%) children. At group level, there were no significant changes in the severity of impairments per domain. However, at individual level, there were less children with a mild abnormal composite score at 10 years of age (44 vs. 20%; p = 0.006), and more with a moderate-severe abnormal composite score (12 vs. 35%; p = 0.001). Especially children with normal/mild outcome at 2 years were likely to shift to other outcome categories over time.Conclusions: Children with early severe impairment are likely experiencing impairments later on, but early normal/mild abnormal outcomes should be interpreted with care, considering the large individual shifts over time. Long-term follow-up in all children born very preterm should therefore be continued to at least school-age.