1992
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90284-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroendocrine and behavioral responses during conditioned active and passive behavior in the defensive burying/probe avoidance paradigm: Effects of ipsapirone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is not likely that the molecular mechanisms underlying extinction are similar to those for acquisition of contextual freezing, as it has been previously suggested for inhibitory avoidance (Szapiro et al, 2003). Because both behaviors similarly depend on contextual memory retrieval, some of the observed discrepancies may be attributable to differences in the intensity of contextual fear (Rachman & Hodgson, 1974) and stress hormone levels (Korte et al, 1992) accompanying avoidance versus immobility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, it is not likely that the molecular mechanisms underlying extinction are similar to those for acquisition of contextual freezing, as it has been previously suggested for inhibitory avoidance (Szapiro et al, 2003). Because both behaviors similarly depend on contextual memory retrieval, some of the observed discrepancies may be attributable to differences in the intensity of contextual fear (Rachman & Hodgson, 1974) and stress hormone levels (Korte et al, 1992) accompanying avoidance versus immobility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…CRF administration has been shown to increase probe burying, while this behavior was blocked by CRF antagonists (Basso et al 1999;Diamant et al 1992;Korte et al 1994). Furthermore, shock-probe burying is accompanied by increases in NE transmission (Bondi et al 2007;Korte et al 1992) and attenuated by pretreatment with noradrenergic antagonists (Morilak et al 2005). Taken together, these data suggest that burying by rodents may be a model response for stress associated with the activation of NE pathways from the LC.…”
Section: Burying Behavior Is Mediated By Forebrain Nementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Rodent burying behavior has long been described as a defensive coping strategy in natural habitats (Calhoun 1962;MacClintock 1970;Owings and Coss 1977). Furthermore, in the context of defensive avoidance, this proactive form of stress management provides an index of anxiety when directed at an electrified probe (Bondi et al 2007;De Boer et al 1990;Korte et al 1992;Treit et al 1981), and is enhanced and attenuated by anxiogenic and anxiolytic drugs, respectively (De Boer and Koolhaas 2003;Diamant et al 1992). To the best of our knowledge, the present studies are the first to specifically characterize and quantify the burying response to i.c.v.…”
Section: Characterization Of Crf-evoked Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on naturalistic observations of rodents' behaviors in response to predators in the wild, the DB test measures differences in coping strategies (Koolhaas et al, 1999;Korte et al, 1992;Pare, 1994;Sluyter et al, 1996;Treit, 1985;Treit et al, 1981) by assaying an animal's behavioral response to an immediate threat with ethological validity (Treit, 1991). In the DB test, the animal unexpectedly receives a mild electric shock, which represents the immediate danger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%