2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurolaw today – A systematic review of the recent law and neuroscience literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, neuroscience can provide insight into how the human brain develops moral and ethical values. (Chandler et al, 2019) This is important in Islamic law, a legal system based on ethics and moral values. Neuroscience has shown that there are areas of the brain involved in moral understanding and judgment, and this can help humans better understand how moral and ethical values are acquired and how this influences behavior.…”
Section: The Influence Of Neuroscience On the Understanding And Pract...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, neuroscience can provide insight into how the human brain develops moral and ethical values. (Chandler et al, 2019) This is important in Islamic law, a legal system based on ethics and moral values. Neuroscience has shown that there are areas of the brain involved in moral understanding and judgment, and this can help humans better understand how moral and ethical values are acquired and how this influences behavior.…”
Section: The Influence Of Neuroscience On the Understanding And Pract...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since approximately 2010, Canadian neurolaw scholarship has taken a comprehensive approach to issues related to the application of the law to neuroscience and to the incorporation of neuroscience evidence in legal disputes. Key neurolaw questions relate, for example, to legal concepts of responsibility, privacy, disability, mental health, human rights, intellectual property rights, and the regulation of healthcare (Chandler et al, 2018). Evidence related to the brain is cited in the context of Canadian civil, criminal, and human rights cases in support of legal arguments about a broad range of matters.…”
Section: Applied Neurolaw Public Discourse and Patient Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is contrasting with "neurophobia, " the fear of neurology, mainly felt by junior medical students (Fuller, 2012). This sudden popularity of brain science in the media (Racine et al, 2010) gave the illusion that neuroscience has become more accessible and applicable in many domains such as law (Chandler et al, 2019), music (Düvel et al, 2017), or sports (Bailey et al, 2018) and gave rise to "neuromyths. " This concept has been defined as a "misconception generated by a misunderstanding, a misreading or a misquoting of facts scientifically established (by brain research) to make a case for use of brain research in education and other contexts. "…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%