2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurometabolic timecourse of healthy aging

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…45,55,56 However, there is a lack of data for sLASER in the literature with which to compare. Negative metabolite-age correlations have been reported for tNAA in the literature 24,27,57 ; however, our results indicate no significant correlation with aging for tNAA for both PRESS and sLASER, possibly due to regional differences compared with the literature. Overall, PRESS and sLASER produced very similar results in metabolite-age concentration relationships: For most metabolites, they agreed either in observing a metabolite-age correlation or not observing any.…”
Section: Glxcontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…45,55,56 However, there is a lack of data for sLASER in the literature with which to compare. Negative metabolite-age correlations have been reported for tNAA in the literature 24,27,57 ; however, our results indicate no significant correlation with aging for tNAA for both PRESS and sLASER, possibly due to regional differences compared with the literature. Overall, PRESS and sLASER produced very similar results in metabolite-age concentration relationships: For most metabolites, they agreed either in observing a metabolite-age correlation or not observing any.…”
Section: Glxcontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Although excellent localization is desirable, localization is not the single factor limiting single-voxel MRS, and it is important not only to demonstrate that sLASER is theoretically preferable, but also that the newer methodology has greater power to interrogate in vivo biochemistry. There is an extensive literature documenting age-related changes in metabolite levels measured with MRS, [24][25][26][27] making age an appropriate external validation variable to compare the performance of PRESS and sLASER. The aim of this study is to compare in vivo brain metabolite concentration measurements and spectral quality between the two sequences, using the same shimming approach in relatively homogeneous brain regions with good B 0 /B 1 shimming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our findings, post‐mortem measurements in a cohort of 20 individuals (10 ASD and 10 TDC, aged 5–38 years old) also did not show significant differences in GSH levels in the frontal, parietal, or occipital cortices (Chauhan et al, 2012), a useful validation of challenging in vivo MRS measures. GSH has limited permeability through the blood–brain barrier (Haddad et al, 2021), a systemic isolation which might contribute to the stability of cerebral GSH levels with pathology (Haddad et al, 2021) and aging (Gong et al, 2022; Saleh, Papantoni, et al, 2020; Tong et al, 2016). Therefore, each type of brain cell (neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes (Rae & Williams, 2017)) relies on their own local synthesis of GSH from cysteine (Cys), glycine, and Glu.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All metabolite levels that were statistically analyzed were corrected for tissue composition. That is, for each participant, GSH levels were estimated after correcting for partial volume effects in each voxel using the method proposed in Gasparovic et al (2018), and GABA levels were alpha‐corrected (Harris et al, 2015), since metabolite levels are reported to differ between brain gray and white matter (Gong et al, 2022). All reported GABA values in this study refer to GABA+, including the modeled co‐edited macromolecules (Mullins et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All metabolite levels that were statistically analyzed were corrected for tissue composition. That is, for each participant, GSH levels were estimated after correcting for partial volume effects in each voxel using the method proposed in Gasparovic et al(Gasparovic et al, 2018), and GABA levels were alpha-corrected(Harris et al, 2015), since metabolite levels are reported to differ between brain gray and white matter(Gong et al, 2022). All reported GABA values in this study refer to GABA+, including the modeled co-edited macromolecules(Mullins et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%