2000
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-000-0021-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuromodulation: Spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation

Abstract: Spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation for relief of chronic intractable pain have been used since the mid-1960s. Multiple mechanisms of action have been theorized without a clear-cut winner. The early frustrations with patient selection criteria and equipment difficulties have diminished secondary to carefully controlled studies and improvements in equipment designs. Efficacy studies consistently show an overall 50% improvement in long-term pain control in patients who have failed conservative or other … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8] Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment, even if the results are controversial, in particular for CRPS type II. SCS does not produce a durable and statistically significant improvement in the pain from chronic CRPS-I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment, even if the results are controversial, in particular for CRPS type II. SCS does not produce a durable and statistically significant improvement in the pain from chronic CRPS-I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reports different experiences and varying outcomes of spinal cord stimulation (1), intrathecal infusion (2), and PNS for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type 2 (3–7). Weiner and Reed (8) and Buschmann and Oppel (9) have reported on the use of PNS via a percutaneous approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early frustrations with patient selection criteria and equipment difficulties have diminished secondary to carefully controlled studies and improvements in equipment designs. Efficacy studies consistently show an overall 50% improvement in long-term pain control in patients who have failed conservative or other invasive modalities [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%