1993
DOI: 10.1159/000474309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuron-Specific Enolase: A Serum Tumor Marker in Malignant Germ-Cell Tumors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum levels of erythropoietin, ferritin, neuron specific enolase and transforming growth factor-b were assayed and have not been found to be of any utility in clinical management of RCC patients [9][10][11][12]. The expression of the tumour proliferation marker Ki-S5 was found to correlate with survival.…”
Section: Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers For Rccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum levels of erythropoietin, ferritin, neuron specific enolase and transforming growth factor-b were assayed and have not been found to be of any utility in clinical management of RCC patients [9][10][11][12]. The expression of the tumour proliferation marker Ki-S5 was found to correlate with survival.…”
Section: Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers For Rccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing the level of serum 'abnormality', there might be only 1 false-positive patient. But otherwise, patients with no evidence of renal cell carcinoma had frequently NSE levels up to 10 pg/1 [25]. The wide range of serum values will make standard deviations and standard errors quite large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 However, large-scale studies have shown frequent false-positive or false-negative results of NSE during follow-up examinations, and thus do not support NSE to be a valuable tumor marker in germ-cell tumors. 24,25 Furthermore, hemolysis leads to an elevation of serum NSE. 25 Accordingly, Sturgeon et al point out that in spite of promising results (30%-50% positivity of patients with seminomas and less often in non-seminomatous germ cell tumor patients), the use of NSE is limited and, so far, only in an experimental stage of development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%