“…Apparently contrary to either such simple interpretation, however, is the fact that the decline in latency of the population spike is consistent with the first dass of mechanism, but not with the second, whereas the dedine in spike amplitude is consistent with the second dass ofmechanism, but not with the first. As a general explanation for this overall pattern of results, it should be noted that numerous factors, such as momentary behavioral state, and activity levels in subcortical areas projecting to the hippocampus have been shown to affect the population spike for these responses, and often do so in the absence of any effects on EPSP values (Abraham & Goddard, 1982;Alvarez-Leefmans & Gardner-Medwin, 1975;Assaf, Mason, & Miller, 1979;Assaf & Miller, 1978;Dahl & Winson, 1986;Fantie & Goddard, 1982;Green, Barnes, & McNaughton, 1986;Robinson & Racine, 1986;Winson, 1980;Winson & Abzug, 1977Winson & Dahl, 1985). Changes in many ofthese factors almost certainly occur as a result of the behavioral manipulations used here.…”