1978
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91091-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuronal transmission in the dentate gyrus: role of inhibitory mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently contrary to either such simple interpretation, however, is the fact that the decline in latency of the population spike is consistent with the first dass of mechanism, but not with the second, whereas the dedine in spike amplitude is consistent with the second dass ofmechanism, but not with the first. As a general explanation for this overall pattern of results, it should be noted that numerous factors, such as momentary behavioral state, and activity levels in subcortical areas projecting to the hippocampus have been shown to affect the population spike for these responses, and often do so in the absence of any effects on EPSP values (Abraham & Goddard, 1982;Alvarez-Leefmans & Gardner-Medwin, 1975;Assaf, Mason, & Miller, 1979;Assaf & Miller, 1978;Dahl & Winson, 1986;Fantie & Goddard, 1982;Green, Barnes, & McNaughton, 1986;Robinson & Racine, 1986;Winson, 1980;Winson & Abzug, 1977Winson & Dahl, 1985). Changes in many ofthese factors almost certainly occur as a result of the behavioral manipulations used here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Apparently contrary to either such simple interpretation, however, is the fact that the decline in latency of the population spike is consistent with the first dass of mechanism, but not with the second, whereas the dedine in spike amplitude is consistent with the second dass ofmechanism, but not with the first. As a general explanation for this overall pattern of results, it should be noted that numerous factors, such as momentary behavioral state, and activity levels in subcortical areas projecting to the hippocampus have been shown to affect the population spike for these responses, and often do so in the absence of any effects on EPSP values (Abraham & Goddard, 1982;Alvarez-Leefmans & Gardner-Medwin, 1975;Assaf, Mason, & Miller, 1979;Assaf & Miller, 1978;Dahl & Winson, 1986;Fantie & Goddard, 1982;Green, Barnes, & McNaughton, 1986;Robinson & Racine, 1986;Winson, 1980;Winson & Abzug, 1977Winson & Dahl, 1985). Changes in many ofthese factors almost certainly occur as a result of the behavioral manipulations used here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The relevant SUM afferents travel through the ipsilateral column of fornix and dorsal fornix, whereas MS afferents project through the dorsal fornix/fimbria. 4. Single units recorded in stratum granulosum (SG) were assessed with respect to several parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8), median and dorsal raphe (e.g., Ref. 4), substantia nigra (32), the parafascicular region (9), and the brain stem reticular formation (38). Another major source of afferents originates in the supramammillary nucleus (SUM) of the hypothalamus (e.g., Refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the inhibitory effects on spontaneous activity of neurons in the hippocampus [1][2][3][4], activation of the forebrain serotonergic innervation in vivo, results in an increased responsiveness of dentate granule cells (DG) to afferent stimulation [4][5][6]. Although manipulations of intrahippocampal reactivity of neurons may underlie the serotonergic modulation of granule cells reactivity [4,6,[7][8][9][10][11], it is possible that these effects are mediated, in part by serotonergic effects on other forebrain areas, interacting with the hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%