2007
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m700016-mcp200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropeptidomics Strategies for Specific and Sensitive Identification of Endogenous Peptides

Abstract: A new approach using targeted sequence collections has been developed for identifying endogenous peptides. This approach enables a fast, specific, and sensitive identification of endogenous peptides. Three different sequence collections were constituted in this study to mimic the peptidomic samples: SwePep precursors, SwePep peptides, and SwePep predicted. The searches for neuropeptides performed against these three sequence collections were compared with searches performed against the entire mouse proteome, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the enkephalin neuropeptides (met-enk-RF and met-enk-RSL) were clearly detected in the stabilized samples and almost undetectable in the snap-frozen samples. Interestingly, the isotopically labeled neuropeptides added as internal standards were only detected in stabilized tissue, aside from the labeled protein fragment stathmin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) which was detected independent of sample treatment, indicating ex vivo proteolytic activity and the relative stability of the stathmin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) fragment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the enkephalin neuropeptides (met-enk-RF and met-enk-RSL) were clearly detected in the stabilized samples and almost undetectable in the snap-frozen samples. Interestingly, the isotopically labeled neuropeptides added as internal standards were only detected in stabilized tissue, aside from the labeled protein fragment stathmin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) which was detected independent of sample treatment, indicating ex vivo proteolytic activity and the relative stability of the stathmin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) fragment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice in a fourth sample group (n ) 4) were killed by focused microwave irradiation (1.4 s at 4.5-5 kW, Muromachi Kikai, Tokyo, Japan) which denature the proteins before dissection and homogenization. A microtip ultrasonicator (Vibra-Cell, Sonics & Materials) was used to homogenize the tissue in 5× the sample weight of 0.25% HAc extraction solution containing 40 mM of isotopically labeled stathmin (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), met-enkephalin, neurotensin, substance P (1-11), and substance P (1-7) as internal standards. The crude extract was centrifuged at 20 000g for 30 min at 4°C to pellet cell debris and ultrafiltered using a 10 kDa centrifugal cutoff filter (Microcon YM-10, Millipore) to isolate the peptide content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A homology search is unreliable for short amino acid or nucleotide sequences, and special techniques are frequently needed for both experimental and computational analyses. (62) Currently, the prediction of protein coding sequences is made by computational programs having certain artificial limitations: in particular, arbitrary length threshold (e.g. CDS should be greater than 100 codons).…”
Section: Types Of Alternative Open Reading Framesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein is submitted to in silico cleavage according to the following template: (K/R)X m (K/R)X k (K/R)X n (K/R), where X is any amino acid, m and n correspond to 0, 2, 4, 6, and k corresponds to 3-50. The residues X k represent the predicted neuropeptide sequence [23,24] (See the workflow presented in Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%