2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11114-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological and behavioural correlates of ocrelizumab therapy on manual dexterity in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Abstract: Background Hand dexterity impairment is a key feature of disability in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). So far, ocrelizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20-expressing B cells, is the only therapy approved for PPMS and recent analysis reported its ability to reduce the risk of upper limb disability progression. However, the neural mechanisms underlying hand impairment in PPMS and the brain networks behind the effect of ocrelizum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, there were no group differences detected for SSEP measurements. An absence of SSEP deficits opposes several previous MS studies (Chiappa, 1980;Comi et al, 1999;Dubbioso et al, 2022;Trojaborg & Petersen, 1979; Walsh et al, 2005), where SSEP abnormality rates occurred in $60%-80% (Chiappa, 1980;Trojaborg & Petersen, 1979) of MS individuals. As there were no differences in the ascending SSEP in the current study, MS-related SAI differences were most likely associated with central integration of the sensory and motor signal.…”
Section: Sai Is Reduced With Msmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, there were no group differences detected for SSEP measurements. An absence of SSEP deficits opposes several previous MS studies (Chiappa, 1980;Comi et al, 1999;Dubbioso et al, 2022;Trojaborg & Petersen, 1979; Walsh et al, 2005), where SSEP abnormality rates occurred in $60%-80% (Chiappa, 1980;Trojaborg & Petersen, 1979) of MS individuals. As there were no differences in the ascending SSEP in the current study, MS-related SAI differences were most likely associated with central integration of the sensory and motor signal.…”
Section: Sai Is Reduced With Msmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Although this is the first study to reveal that fatiguing contractions suppress SAI, there are several previous reports that SAI is affected in people with MS while in a resting state (Cucurachi et al, 2008; Dubbioso et al, 2022; Mango et al, 2019; Topkan et al, 2022) or when administered pharmacological interventions known to improve motor function (Dubbioso et al, 2022; Nicoletti et al, 2019). The neurotransmitters that are implicated in SAI include acetylcholine and GABA, where SAI is enhanced by cholinergic transmission (Di Lazzaro et al, 2000, 2005; Fujiki et al, 2006) and reduced by GABAergic transmission (Di Lazzaro et al, 2007; Teo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The underlying etiology of fatigue, cognitive impairment, and pain in MS may be similar, and the overlap may be a result of lesions in MS occurring in highly interconnected deep gray matter, whereby their ripple effects may affect a variety of other brain circuits ( 59 ). It has been proposed that PwMS with impairment of hand performance may be correlated with cortico-cortical disconnections due to demyelination or a strict disruption of the motor network caused by neurodegenerative processes ( 60 ). Since NIBS has been widely used as rehabilitation treatments for neurological diseases and various mechanisms based on neuroplasticity, neural protection and/or regeneration induced by NIBS are being explored, adaptation of NIBS protocols according to different stages of brain damage and degeneration await further research ( 61 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, the second most frequently investigated evoked potential in EEG is MEP, whose latency, amplitude and any detected abnormalities have extensively been analysed and investigated 14,20,21,25,31,32,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] . Interestingly, SSEPs 10,17,20,21,28,35,36,43,[46][47][48] and AEPs 8,16,17,28 were less common and frequently used in the reviewed studies, but still offer, when combined with other evoked potentials, solid composite scores. Similarly, authors in 49,50 investigated and analysed evoked related potential (ERP) responses in MS patients by using the two-tone oddball paradigm.…”
Section: Eeg and Evoked Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%