2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000239135.90175.4f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroprotection During Chemotherapy

Abstract: The development of neurotoxicity during antineoplastic therapy is one of the most common reasons for termination or modification of cancer treatment. A number of different agents have been proposed to provide neuroprotection without affecting antitumor efficacy. This review provides an evidence-based summary of neuroprotective medicines, an overview of the literature relating to neuroprotection during cancer treatment and a Neurologist perspective risk assessment and management. Through a systematic review the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, analgesic adjuvants used to relieve the symptoms of PN during chemotherapy did not show adequate prophylactic efficacy. Thus, in agreement with prior studies (Kannarkat et al, 2007;Ocean et al, 2004;Park et al,2008;Walker et al, 2007;Windebank et al, 2008;Wolf et al, 2008) it can be concluded that no effective analgesic adjuvants are currently available for CIPN. Verstappen et al reported that while neuropathic changes were observed in both dose intensity groups, the higher dose intensity group reported significantly more symptoms during therapy, whereas neurologic signs were significantly more p r o m i n e n t a f t e r a c u m u l a t i v e d o s e o f 1 2 m g v i n c r i s t i n e (Verstappen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Vinca Alkaloidssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, analgesic adjuvants used to relieve the symptoms of PN during chemotherapy did not show adequate prophylactic efficacy. Thus, in agreement with prior studies (Kannarkat et al, 2007;Ocean et al, 2004;Park et al,2008;Walker et al, 2007;Windebank et al, 2008;Wolf et al, 2008) it can be concluded that no effective analgesic adjuvants are currently available for CIPN. Verstappen et al reported that while neuropathic changes were observed in both dose intensity groups, the higher dose intensity group reported significantly more symptoms during therapy, whereas neurologic signs were significantly more p r o m i n e n t a f t e r a c u m u l a t i v e d o s e o f 1 2 m g v i n c r i s t i n e (Verstappen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Vinca Alkaloidssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…CIPN is a dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy that often develops in response to administration of various drugs, in particular, bortezomib, taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), oxaliplatin and vincristine (Kannarkat et al, 2007;Ocean et al, 2004;Park et al,2008;Walker et al, 2007;Windebank et al, 2008;Wolf et al, 2008). However, effective strategies for preventing or treating CIPN are lacking.…”
Section: Predictors Of Cipnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…& Several other compounds have been evaluated in CIPN models, and some of them deserve to be mentioned because they could represent interesting candidates for future clinical testing [43,44]. & Acetyl-L-carnitine has shown promising results in several animal models of CIPN induced by oxaliplatin, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and vincristine.…”
Section: Other Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clinical importance of a major toxic side effect of the currently available platinum drugs, that is, peripheral neurotoxicity, is under-represented. This is surprising, as platinum-induced sensory neuropathy can be a dose-limiting toxicity 2,3 and despite extensive efforts we are still unable to prevent or treat it 4,5 , as evidenced by the significant number of ongoing neuroprotection clinical trials focused on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (for a detailed, although only partial, list see the United States National Institutes of Health website ClinicalTrials.gov).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%