1990
DOI: 10.1080/87565649009540459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological aspects of reading and spelling performance in children with learning disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study a difference in spelling skills was noted. Integration of these findings might be possible through research on neuropsychological predictors of academic skills in reading and written spelling as in Batchelor, et al (1990). They reported visual tracking, short-term visual memory, psychomotor speed, and spatial integration and organization predicted reading recognition, and for written spelling, visual sequencing was a unique predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study a difference in spelling skills was noted. Integration of these findings might be possible through research on neuropsychological predictors of academic skills in reading and written spelling as in Batchelor, et al (1990). They reported visual tracking, short-term visual memory, psychomotor speed, and spatial integration and organization predicted reading recognition, and for written spelling, visual sequencing was a unique predictor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These study skills require map reading and dictionary skills and are related to mastery of written language. Batchelor, Kixmiller, and Dean (1990) reported that, among the neuropsychological predictors of academic skds, there was a difference among predictors of reading recognition vs written spelling skills. Measures of visual tracking, short-term visual memory, psychomotor speed, spatial integration, and spatial organization were significant predictors of reading recognition, whereas for written spelling, visual sequencing was the only unique predictor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both quantitative, standardized measures and qualitative clinical data contribute to a comprehensive assessment of child functioning during rehabilitation (Batchelor, 1996;Ylvisaker et al, 1990). Each approach has advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Professional Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the response mode required by the Performance subtests is generally manual, whereas the response mode required by the Verbal subtests is speech. It is well established that poor readers can evince a range of cognitive deficits (Batchelor, Kixmiller & Dean, 1990, found 14 individual cognitive skills which predicted reading performance in learning-disabled children). Hence, discrepancies between verbal and spatial scores could result from different task demands, rather than differences in primary verbal and spatial reasoning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%