1974
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-197404000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuropsychological Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis in a Neuropsychiatric Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative to normal controls or non-brain-damaged patient controls, MS patients have been found to be impaired in seven studies (Elpern et al, 1984;Heaton et al, 1985;Jambor, 1969;Parsons et al, 1957;Peyser, Edwards, Poser, & Filskov, 1980;, with only one negative study (Ross & Reitan, 1955). Four studies have compared MS patients to groups of mixed braindamaged patients; none of the four studies found statistical differences between these two groups (Goldstein & Shelly, 1974;Ivnik, 1978b;Ross & Reitan, 1955). Two studies compared MS patients to psychiatric controls with mixed results (Jambor, 1969;Goldstein & Shelly, 1974).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative to normal controls or non-brain-damaged patient controls, MS patients have been found to be impaired in seven studies (Elpern et al, 1984;Heaton et al, 1985;Jambor, 1969;Parsons et al, 1957;Peyser, Edwards, Poser, & Filskov, 1980;, with only one negative study (Ross & Reitan, 1955). Four studies have compared MS patients to groups of mixed braindamaged patients; none of the four studies found statistical differences between these two groups (Goldstein & Shelly, 1974;Ivnik, 1978b;Ross & Reitan, 1955). Two studies compared MS patients to psychiatric controls with mixed results (Jambor, 1969;Goldstein & Shelly, 1974).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Wechsler scales, several studies have compared the performance of MS patients to that of various control groups, including normals (Jambor, 1969, Parsons, Stewart, & Arenberg, 1957Reitan, Reed, & Dyken, 1971), brain-damaged patients (Goldstein & Shelly, 1974;Ivnik, 1978b, Jambor, 1969, non-brain-damaged, neurologically disabled patients (Jambor, 1969), and psychiatric patients (Goldstein & Shelly, 1974;Jambor, 1969). These studies are noteworthy for the lack of significant mean group differences both for the IQ and individual subtest scores.…”
Section: Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldstein and Shelly [20] argued that depression is the main reason for deficient cognitive functions in patients with MS, and Arnett et al [21] found that depressed MS patients made significantly more moves and took more time per trial on the Tower of London task than nondepressed patients. However, a majority of recent studies note that depression does not account for impaired cognition in MS [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the MS group the presence of subtle cognitive anomalies in a pro portion of patients with mild MS is now gener ally accepted (Beatty & Gange, 1977;Grant, McDonald, & Trimble, 1989;Peyser & Poser, 1986;Rao, 1986). Moreover, this cognitive im pairment appears to be independent of other psy chological phenomena such as depression or motor/sensory symptoms (Goldstein & Shelley, 1974;Good, Clark, Oger, Paty, & Klonoff, 1992;Rao et al, 1991). The comparisons with the normal group suggest that impairment of cognitive functions was present in this MS group in terms of scores on some WAIS-R per formance subtests and the word fluency test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%