“…Findings from the initial validation study suggested the Bell-Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task ( BLERT ; Bell, Bryson, & Lysaker, 1997), Penn Emotion Recognition Task ( ER-40 ; Kohler et al, 2003), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test ( Eyes ; Baron-Cohen et al, 2003), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test ( TASIT ; McDonald et al, 2003), and Hinting Task ( Hinting ; Corcoran, Mercer, & Frith, 1995), displayed acceptable reliability and validity for implementation in clinical research. Remaining measures, including: Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire ( AIHQ ; Combs et al, 2007), Relationships Across Domains ( RAD ; Sergi et al, 2009), and Trustworthiness Task ( Trust ; Adolphs, Tranel, & Damasio, 1998), demonstrated weaker characteristics and were deemed inadequate for use in clinical trials targeting social cognition (Pinkham et al, 2015), although subsequent findings support continued development and use of the AIHQ Blame Score (Buck et al, 2017, in press).…”