2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11908-005-0060-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurosyphilis: A current review

Abstract: Neurosyphilis continues to be a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. The decision to perform a lumbar puncture, interpretation of cerebrospinal fluid findings, clear diagnostic guidelines, establishment of definitive therapy (including alternatives to penicillins), and approach to the follow-up of patients with neurosyphilis are all areas that pose ongoing challenges to clinicians. Coinfection with HIV has also further complicated the already challenging arena of neurosyphilis presentation, diagnosis, and manag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
21
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no gold standard tests for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis, but definitive diagnosis usually requires serologic confirmation of syphilis infection (any stage) together with a reactive cerebrospinal fluid VDRL test (74). In addition, the criteria for asymptomatic neurosyphilis have not been standardized and have been applied inconsistently in research studies, further complicating the interpretation of tests used to diagnose neurosyphilis (75,76).…”
Section: Neurosyphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are no gold standard tests for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis, but definitive diagnosis usually requires serologic confirmation of syphilis infection (any stage) together with a reactive cerebrospinal fluid VDRL test (74). In addition, the criteria for asymptomatic neurosyphilis have not been standardized and have been applied inconsistently in research studies, further complicating the interpretation of tests used to diagnose neurosyphilis (75,76).…”
Section: Neurosyphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, however, that the results of a CSF examination are frequently normal in patients with auditory involvement (78). Whenever the eye or ear or both are involved, the patient case is managed as a neurosyphilis infection regardless of CSF findings (76). The value of identifying asymptomatic neurosyphilis, particularly in HIV-coinfected patients, remains controversial (74,77).…”
Section: Neurosyphilismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the results of a CSF examination are often normal in patients with hearing impairment [9]. Whenever the eye or the ear or both are involved, the patient's case is managed as a neurosyphilis regardless of CSF results [7]. The available tests for the detection of syphilis in the CSF can be divided into direct detection and antibody analysis methods.…”
Section: Vdrl (Venereal Disease Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early neurosyphilis occurs in the first weeks to years after infection and principally involves the meninges, sometimes with involvement of structures that traverse the subarachnoid space, such as cranial nerves and cerebral arteries. Syphilitic meningitis, which occasionally complicates secondary syphilis, presents as headache and meningismus, sometimes associated with cranial neuropathies (most commonly II, III, VI, VII) and less commonly seizures, hydrocephalus, or spinal cord dysfunction (meningomyelitis) [14,15,Class III]. Meningovascular syphilis presents as meningitis with ischemic stroke, often in a young person.…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%