1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurotransmitter interactions in schizophrenia—therapeutic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
108
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the lack of inhibitory effect of raclopride at a dose that significantly blocks dopamine D 2 neurotransmission argues against a primary role for dopamine D 2 receptors in the generation of psychotic symptoms by NMDAR antagonists, and suggests that the efficacy of clozapine in the models is not due to D 2 receptor blockade. Consistent with the present observations with raclopride, NMDAR antagonists are reported to increase dopamine release in limbic and frontal cortical brain areas Hertel et al, 1995), but dopamine D 2 receptor antagonists or dopamine depletion was unable to prevent the behavioral effects induced by NMDAR antagonists in rodents (Idris et al, 2005;Linn et al, 2003;Carlsson et al, 1999;Duncan et al, 1998a;Corbett et al, 1995) and humans (Krystal et al, 1999). These findings also underscore a potential limitation in the validity of the NMDAR deficit model as a tool to predict the therapeutic efficacy of antipsychotic agents relying on blockade of D 2 dopamine receptors.…”
Section: Effect Of Antipsychotic Drugssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, the lack of inhibitory effect of raclopride at a dose that significantly blocks dopamine D 2 neurotransmission argues against a primary role for dopamine D 2 receptors in the generation of psychotic symptoms by NMDAR antagonists, and suggests that the efficacy of clozapine in the models is not due to D 2 receptor blockade. Consistent with the present observations with raclopride, NMDAR antagonists are reported to increase dopamine release in limbic and frontal cortical brain areas Hertel et al, 1995), but dopamine D 2 receptor antagonists or dopamine depletion was unable to prevent the behavioral effects induced by NMDAR antagonists in rodents (Idris et al, 2005;Linn et al, 2003;Carlsson et al, 1999;Duncan et al, 1998a;Corbett et al, 1995) and humans (Krystal et al, 1999). These findings also underscore a potential limitation in the validity of the NMDAR deficit model as a tool to predict the therapeutic efficacy of antipsychotic agents relying on blockade of D 2 dopamine receptors.…”
Section: Effect Of Antipsychotic Drugssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Nor is it likely to be a simple additive effect, as LY354740 alone, tested in one baboon, did not cause a decrease of [ 11 C]raclopride binding. The results of this study should be discussed in the context of the model of GLU-DA interaction introduced by Carlsson (Carlsson et al, 1999;Kegeles et al, 2000). According to this model, activity of midbrain DA neurons is modulated by cortical and limbic structures via both an activating pathway and an inhibitory pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We find a very marked positive correlation between change in k D 3 and improvement in negative symptoms; that is, patients with the strongest decrease in thalamic k D 3 demonstrated the most pronounced decrease in the PANSS negative symptoms subscore. The thalamus seems to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenic symptomatology and is probably also an important site through which the clinical effects of antipsychotics are mediated (Carlsson et al, 1999b). It is an essential structure for controlling arousal and the transmission of sensory inputFboth from the outside world as well as from internal states of the bodyFto the cerebral cortex (Carlsson et al, 1999a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%