2017
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurovascular unit alteration in somatosensory cortex and enhancement of thermal nociception induced by amphetamine involves central AT1 receptor activation

Abstract: The use of psychostimulants, such as amphetamine (Amph), is associated with inflammatory processes, involving glia and vasculature alterations. Brain Angiotensin II (Ang II), through AT -receptors (AT -R), modulates neurotransmission and plays a crucial role in inflammatory responses in brain vasculature and glia. Our aim for the present work was to evaluate the role of AT -R in long-term alterations induced by repeated exposure to Amph. Astrocyte reactivity, neuronal survival and brain microvascular network w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our results extend the Amph deleterious effects to the microvascular rearrangement in PFC ( Figure 2); supporting their region-specific toxicity as vascular network, modifications are closely related to inflammatory processes (Costa, Incio, & Soares, 2007). Similar vascular alterations have been previously described after Amph exposure (Occhieppo et al, 2017), chronic inflammatory disease (Dorr et al, 2012), and schizophrenia (Katsel, Roussos, Pletnikov, & Haroutunian, 2017).…”
Section: Glial Reactivity and Vascular Network Rearrangement Inducesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, our results extend the Amph deleterious effects to the microvascular rearrangement in PFC ( Figure 2); supporting their region-specific toxicity as vascular network, modifications are closely related to inflammatory processes (Costa, Incio, & Soares, 2007). Similar vascular alterations have been previously described after Amph exposure (Occhieppo et al, 2017), chronic inflammatory disease (Dorr et al, 2012), and schizophrenia (Katsel, Roussos, Pletnikov, & Haroutunian, 2017).…”
Section: Glial Reactivity and Vascular Network Rearrangement Inducesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our previous reports support the AT 1 ‐R involvement in the development of Amph‐induced neuroadaptations at neurochemical, structural, and behavioral levels (Paz, Assis, Cabrera, Cancela, & Bregonzio, ; Paz, Marchese, Cancela, & Bregonzio, ; Occhieppo et al, ). Moreover, a long‐lasting overexpression of functional AT 1 ‐R was observed in DA‐innervated areas after Amph exposure (Paz et al, ), whereas altered AT 1 ‐R functionality was described regarding classical AngII‐elicited actions (Casarsa et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, although abstinence following chronic amphetamine administration was also shown to increase GFAP immunoreactivity in the dorsal striatum, there was no change in the NAc and PFC [248]. GFAP expression was also increased in the somatosensory cortex after 17 days of abstinence from chronic non-contingent amphetamine administration [249]. In support of these findings, one month or 2 days after administration of a neurotoxic methamphetamine regimen, GFAP expression was persistently increased [250] In brief, although some studies have reported no changes in GFAP expression after withdrawal from amphetamine or methamphetamine treatment, a number of others have shown an increase in GFAP expression.…”
Section: Substance Use Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time taken to shake or lick its paws was considered as the first sign of nociception. A cutoff period of 120 s was set to avoid animal thermal injury (Occhieppo et al., 2017). We considered three variables (a) time taken to feel the stimulus (Initial Time), (b) time taken to escape from the stimulus (Final Time), and (c) the difference between final time and the initial time (Reaction Time).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%