2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00307-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in vitro porcine investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
3
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
61
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic surrogates of the quasistatic NZ have been previously suggested. The width of the hysteresis loop as proposed by Wilke et al (Wilke et al, 1998b) has been reported to be smaller than the quasistatic NZ despite the terminal load being the same (Goertzen et al, 2004). This is likely due to the creep associated with quasistatic loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynamic surrogates of the quasistatic NZ have been previously suggested. The width of the hysteresis loop as proposed by Wilke et al (Wilke et al, 1998b) has been reported to be smaller than the quasistatic NZ despite the terminal load being the same (Goertzen et al, 2004). This is likely due to the creep associated with quasistatic loading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Goertzen et al compared the ROM and the width of the hysteresis loop between quasistatic and continuous loading methods. They found both ROM and hysteresis loop width to be less in the continuous motion protocol (Goertzen et al, 2004). Thompson et al proposed the amount of movement occurring while the slope of the moment-displacement curve is near 0 as a dynamic NZ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the University of British Columbia (UBC) Spine Motion Simulator [13] (Fig. 1), a pure moment of ±5 Nm was applied to the superior-most free vertebra (T8) in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR), for each surgical condition.…”
Section: Flexibility Test Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six human cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens, L3-S1, were subjected to three-dimensional flexibility testing in axial rotation, lateral bending and flexion-extension, using an unconstrained testing machine [24]. The data from an additional seven specimens were used in conjunction for the validation of the FE model.…”
Section: Specimen Preparation and Biomechanical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spine motion simulator applied pure non-constraining ± 10 Nm moments to the top vertebra at approximately 2°/s in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation for three cycles [24]. A 600 N compressive preload followed the contour of the spine ensuring compression perpendicular to the endplates between each segment [25,26].…”
Section: Specimen Preparation and Biomechanical Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%