1963
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.10.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Production from a Steady-State, Hot-Electron, Deuterium Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments on the heating of plasmas by MW sources based on the ECR have proved the efficiency of this method for generating plasmas with densities up to 10 12 -10 14 cm −3 . If the plasma is confined in a trap by a mirror magnetic field, hot electrons are generated in the central plane of the trap [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These experiments were done for a thermonuclear plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments on the heating of plasmas by MW sources based on the ECR have proved the efficiency of this method for generating plasmas with densities up to 10 12 -10 14 cm −3 . If the plasma is confined in a trap by a mirror magnetic field, hot electrons are generated in the central plane of the trap [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. These experiments were done for a thermonuclear plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss rate could be used to estimate the appropriate loss rate in Eq. (13). However, the two-dimensional nature of the problem in the low w range suggests that a two-dimensional formulation of the problem would be appropriate.…”
Section: R77-953500-27mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9): S•K·n .V (12) The FAD has an output for each beam component; full, half and third energy, and each channel is calibrated separately. Equation (12) is then solved in each case for the calibration constant, K, which contains the desired calibration information: Kl = 2.88 x 10-16 volt -sec/ion (full energy) K2 = 6.85 x 10-17 (1/2 energy) KJ = 1.93 x [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] (1/3 energy).…”
Section: Fast Atom Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation