1980
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(80)90950-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron-proton charge exchange scattering between 190 MeV and 590 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This propels the need for testing electronic equipment. There are only a few facilities, e.g., at Los Alamos [5] and Paul Scherrer Institute [6], and also recently at CERN [7], that offer a white neutron source similar to the atmospheric spectrum, i.e., neutron sources well suited for simple and fast tests of soft error effects in electronic devices. However, there are a number of other facilities that might equally well be used for these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This propels the need for testing electronic equipment. There are only a few facilities, e.g., at Los Alamos [5] and Paul Scherrer Institute [6], and also recently at CERN [7], that offer a white neutron source similar to the atmospheric spectrum, i.e., neutron sources well suited for simple and fast tests of soft error effects in electronic devices. However, there are a number of other facilities that might equally well be used for these tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also some other np differential cross section measurements appeared to have systematic errors similar (but not identical) to the Uppsala data; the Princeton [6] and Freiburg [7,10] data are prominent examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some flaws, on the other hand, are so serious that their contribution to χ 2 dominates over the statistical contribution to the extent that the standard rules of statistics no longer apply. Consequently, such data sets [6][7][8][9][10] must be excluded from the databases used in PWA's. This is of course an unfortunate and undesirable situation, especially in view of the waste of investment and effort involved in these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also discrepancies among various backward differential cross-section data (see Refs. [46] and [48]j. In addition to the free np results, np quasielastic ( p d j scattering measurements exist in this same energy region for differential cross sections [64-661, polarizations [66-791, and other spin observables [8,19,20,69-71,76,78-821. Comparison of free and quasielastic spin observable data for pp elastic scattering frequently shows good agreement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%