1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(97)00252-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron reflectivity studies of Aerosol-OT monolayers adsorbed at the oil/water, air/water and hydrophobic solid/wate interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 and 7, the area per molecule of AOT at the octane/water (brine) interface assuming a fully ionized monolayer was estimated to range between 0.45 and 4 nm 2 /mol. The lower portion of the range is in agreement with AOT headgroup areas reported in literature 0.58-0.7 nm 2 /mol [50][51][52][53]. The higher values are for experiments where no NaCl was present and electrostatic repulsion between adjacent surfactant ions in the interface was greatest.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Of Octane Droplets In Different Winsor Regimessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 and 7, the area per molecule of AOT at the octane/water (brine) interface assuming a fully ionized monolayer was estimated to range between 0.45 and 4 nm 2 /mol. The lower portion of the range is in agreement with AOT headgroup areas reported in literature 0.58-0.7 nm 2 /mol [50][51][52][53]. The higher values are for experiments where no NaCl was present and electrostatic repulsion between adjacent surfactant ions in the interface was greatest.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Of Octane Droplets In Different Winsor Regimessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…From droplet size diameters measured by DLS, the interfacial areas of all droplets at specific time points were estimated. Thus, using an AOT head group area of 0.69 nm 2 (see below), the required number of AOT monomers to stabilize the octane/water interface was estimated [51][52][53]. It was found that for the 70/20/10 system the available AOT monomers were more than sufficient to cover the interface for a mean drop diameter of 39 nm, the smallest reported mean diameter for this system.…”
Section: Phase Behavior and Interfacial Tensions Of Octane/aot/brine mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a to be 2.5 mM. This compares well with quoted values for the cmc of AOT: 2.5 mM (Li et al 1998) and 2.66 mM (Umlong and Ismail 2005). The data shown in Fig.…”
Section: Surface Tension Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of SDS is 8 mM (Hernainz and Caro 2002;Sanchez-Camazano et al 2000). Aerosol-OT (AOT) solutions were similarly prepared from a stock solution to provide a concentration range from 5 Â 10 À5 to 5 Â 10 À3 M. The CMC of AOT is 2.5 mM (Li et al 1998). Five grams of soil was weighed into conical flasks and 50 ml of solution added, yielding a 0.1 (w/v) soil/solution ratio.…”
Section: Batch Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutron reflectometry also demonstrated that the oil/water interfacial thickness is 3 times thicker than air/water interface [37]. Due the presence of long decane molecules, the oil/water interface produces additional volume that is available for CTA + molecules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%