1982
DOI: 10.1086/183840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron star envelopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…similar core temperatures during the neutrino dominated cooling era), those with strong toroidal fields have an apparent effective temperature about a factor 2 smaller than those with low magnetic fields or purely dipolar configurations. Our result can also be compared to the classical formula that relates the temperature at the base of the envelope with the surface temperature (Gudmundsson et al 1982)…”
Section: Effective Temperaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…similar core temperatures during the neutrino dominated cooling era), those with strong toroidal fields have an apparent effective temperature about a factor 2 smaller than those with low magnetic fields or purely dipolar configurations. Our result can also be compared to the classical formula that relates the temperature at the base of the envelope with the surface temperature (Gudmundsson et al 1982)…”
Section: Effective Temperaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The thermalization and BEC formation of DM in the interior of compact stars depend on significantly the star's internal temperature T c which is largely uncertain in observations. For NSs, following our previous work (Zheng et al 2015), the T c can be estimated from the relatively well-studied NS's surface temperature T s based on the study of thermal structure of the insulating envelope presented by Gudmundsson et al (1982). In particular, Gudmundsson et al (1982) found that the temperature T b measured at inner boundary of the envelope (with density ρ ∼ 10 10 g cm −3 ) can be related to the surface temperature T s as…”
Section: Compact Star Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For constant opacity, the integration gives F ∝ T 4 , but the scaling with temperature can be different when the opacity is temperature and depth dependent. For example, the relation between surface temperature T eff and the temperature deep in the crust at densities of ρ 10 10 g cm −3 is T eff ∝ T 2.2 (Gudmundsson et al 1982). We calculated a series of constant flux temperature profiles in the neutron star envelope to determine the scaling of luminosity with temperature at the base of the layer, L ∝ T γ .…”
Section: Intrinsic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%