2018
DOI: 10.1002/er.4207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutronic design and analysis of advanced long-cycle boron-free operation of a small modular reactor core with particle type burnable poison rods

Abstract: Summary Soluble boron in the reactor coolant plays an important role for operation of pressurized water reactors (PWRs), but it leads to several issues such as generation of a huge amount of liquid waste, complications in the primary coolant system, and corrosion of system components. This work introduces an advanced small modular reactor (SMR) core concept that can operate over a long cycle without soluble boron and with inherent safety features. The large portion of excess reactivity for compensating for fue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to other soluble boron‐free SMPWR designs, such as SHELF, ABV‐6M, NuScale, mPower, CAREM, SMART, KLT‐40S, RITM‐200, VK‐300, KLT‐40S, RITM‐200, IMR, 1 SMR with Big‐T, 5 and SMR with particle‐type burnable poison, 2,3,6 the singular feature of the newly designed SMPWR is a long‐cycle operation through the use of ring‐type burnable absorber (R‐BA) 7‐9 and adjuster CRs with axially‐heterogeneous compositions. Unlike the previous SMPWR design with R‐BA in which Zr‐ 167 Er and “inside coating” (Fuel‐BA‐Cladding) are utilized, the proposed SMPWR design uses gadolinium and “outside coating” (Fuel‐Cladding‐BA) as the BA material and geometry, respectively, to improve the manufacturing feasibility; additionally, the target cycle length is set to 50 months instead of 36 months 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to other soluble boron‐free SMPWR designs, such as SHELF, ABV‐6M, NuScale, mPower, CAREM, SMART, KLT‐40S, RITM‐200, VK‐300, KLT‐40S, RITM‐200, IMR, 1 SMR with Big‐T, 5 and SMR with particle‐type burnable poison, 2,3,6 the singular feature of the newly designed SMPWR is a long‐cycle operation through the use of ring‐type burnable absorber (R‐BA) 7‐9 and adjuster CRs with axially‐heterogeneous compositions. Unlike the previous SMPWR design with R‐BA in which Zr‐ 167 Er and “inside coating” (Fuel‐BA‐Cladding) are utilized, the proposed SMPWR design uses gadolinium and “outside coating” (Fuel‐Cladding‐BA) as the BA material and geometry, respectively, to improve the manufacturing feasibility; additionally, the target cycle length is set to 50 months instead of 36 months 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been increasing interest in SMRs because they can fulfill the need for flexible power generation for a wide range of applications and have improved safety features such as passive safety and natural circulation, and low risk in capital investment, in comparison with large scale commercial PWRs 15,16 …”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider PWR technology since this has a proven record in maritime applications, and SBF (Yoo and Hong, 2018) operation for operational simplicity. The elimination of soluble boron has advantages in terms of simplification (removal of pipes, pumps and purification systems), space saving, the elimination of the corrosive e↵ects of soluble boron, and improved safety e↵ects (improvement of the moderator temperature coe cient and elimination of an entire class of boron dilution accidents (Kim et al, 1998)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%