2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, AHP method has been applied to different fields such as strategic planning (Arbel and Orger, 1990), evaluation of advanced construction technology (Skibniewski and Chao, 1992), warehouse site selection (Korpela and Tuominen, 1996), strategic investment analysis (Angels and Lee, 1996), facility location selection (Yang and Lee, 1997), project management (Al Harbi, 2001), software selection (Lai et al, 2002;Karaarslan and Gundogar, 2009), managing risk in supplay chain (Gaudenzi and Borghesi, 2006), selection process for a project variant (Cabała, 2010), supplier selection (Bruno et al, 2012), inventory classification (Lolli et al, 2014), energy management (Jovanovic´ et al, 2015), identifying the factors affecting on labor productivity of construction projects (Sherekar and Tatikonda, 2016), risk evaualtion (Zeng and Xu, 2017), assessing renewable energy sources (Nasirov et al, 2017). In addition, AHP method has been also used in the literature to determine the weights of the criteria in MCDM problems.…”
Section: Analytic Hierarch Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, AHP method has been applied to different fields such as strategic planning (Arbel and Orger, 1990), evaluation of advanced construction technology (Skibniewski and Chao, 1992), warehouse site selection (Korpela and Tuominen, 1996), strategic investment analysis (Angels and Lee, 1996), facility location selection (Yang and Lee, 1997), project management (Al Harbi, 2001), software selection (Lai et al, 2002;Karaarslan and Gundogar, 2009), managing risk in supplay chain (Gaudenzi and Borghesi, 2006), selection process for a project variant (Cabała, 2010), supplier selection (Bruno et al, 2012), inventory classification (Lolli et al, 2014), energy management (Jovanovic´ et al, 2015), identifying the factors affecting on labor productivity of construction projects (Sherekar and Tatikonda, 2016), risk evaualtion (Zeng and Xu, 2017), assessing renewable energy sources (Nasirov et al, 2017). In addition, AHP method has been also used in the literature to determine the weights of the criteria in MCDM problems.…”
Section: Analytic Hierarch Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Th ough the model is simple enough to run without advanced software, it has the flexibility to add and change constraints and factors as needed. Similar attempts to multi-criteria inventory classification (MCIC) include (Bacchetti et al 2013, Hatefi et al 2014, Lolli et al 2014, Millstein et al 2014, Park et al 2014, Roda et al 2014, Soylu and Akyol 2014, Babai et al 2015.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the combined weights are used in the evaluation of credit capacity, which can consider both subjective and objective factors. The results show that the proposed method is reasonable [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%