2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/142703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New and Safe Treatment of Food Impacted in the Esophagus: A Single Center Experience of 100 Consecutive Cases

Abstract: Aim. Large food bits can get stuck in the esophagus and must be removed by endoscopy. In some cases, this can be difficult or unsafe. We describe a new and safe treatment for such patients. Materials and Methods. 100 consecutive patients were referred to Akershus University Hospital with impacted food in the esophagus. In 36 patients (36%), the food passed spontaneously. In 59 (92%) of the remaining 64 patients, the food was removed by endoscopic intervention. In the last five patients, endoscopic removal was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most severe of them is perforation of the esophageal wall, which can lead to mediastinitis, abscess, fistula formation, empyema, sepsis, and death [11, 13, 15, 2022]. Other life treating complications are airway compromise as occurred in our patient, which was treated initially by endotracheal intubation and later endoscopic removal of the FBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The most severe of them is perforation of the esophageal wall, which can lead to mediastinitis, abscess, fistula formation, empyema, sepsis, and death [11, 13, 15, 2022]. Other life treating complications are airway compromise as occurred in our patient, which was treated initially by endotracheal intubation and later endoscopic removal of the FBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Administering cola to human patients to resolve gastric phytobezoars is an effective, noninvasive treatment and is often the only therapeutic agent administered. Cola is sometimes administered in conjunction with endoscopically assisted retrieval of the mass, or mixed with cellulase or pancreatic enzymes (Mohammed and Hegedus 1986;Karanjia and Rees 1993;Chung et al 2006;Ko and Enns 2008;Coskun et al 2011;Ladas et al 2013;Shafique et al 2013;Chun and Popachin 2017). Administering cola rectally to human patients to break down a fecolith has been reported (Lee and Kim 2015;Ontanillo et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of administering cola to cause disintegration of a phytobezoar include the minimal mucosal damage caused by this intervention. In many cases, the obstruction (oesophageal, gastric or intestinal) is relieved solely by administering the cola, thus eliminating the likelihood of damaging the oesophageal mucosa or perforating the oesophagus, complications that may accompany attempts to remove the obstruction by endoscopic manipulation or by lavage (Shafique et al 2013). Administering cola may eliminate the need for surgical removal of a phytobezoar (Ladas et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those who search online for remedies for stuck food will find that the internet is replete with advice for cola use. Cola has also been advocated as a safe treatment for patients in whom endoscopic removal of a food bolus is judged to be too risky [17] , [18] . Despite its popularity, there is minimal evidence surrounding cola’s use in removing food boluses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%