1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00132-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New, angle-independent, low-cost Doppler system to measure blood flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median age of the nine volunteers was 22 years (range [19][20][21][22][23]. Six volunteers used oral contraception.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Median age of the nine volunteers was 22 years (range [19][20][21][22][23]. Six volunteers used oral contraception.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doppler ultrasound uses standard ultrasound methods to provide information about the speed and direction of blood flow through the vessel being evaluated. Laser Doppler flowmetry is a non‐invasive method of assessing microcirculatory blood flow, it can detect flow in capillaries as small as 11 µm and as deep as 2 mm below the skin surface . However, these techniques do not provide direct visualization of the microcirculation and often flow is expressed in arbitrary units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,22 Eventually, multiple ultrasound beam systems have emerged as alternative solutions for angle dependency and have been shown to achieve more accurate measurements of blood flow velocity. 19,[23][24][25] Even if an accurate velocity measurement is assumed, however, it will not allow calculation of the flow volume without being spatially and temporarily integrated. 14 Angle dependency, indeed, is not the only contributor to the inaccuracy in the measurement of flow velocity by ultrasonic systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Doppler spectral shift, the RBC velocity, volume and flow can be calculated. The method is accurate enough to detect flow in capillaries as small as 11 micrometers up to 2 mm below the skin surface (Skadalny et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%