2004
DOI: 10.1080/10643380490452362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Approaches for Bioaugmentation as a Remediation Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
127
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 290 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
(249 reference statements)
1
127
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioaugmentation is a promising and low-cost bioremediation method in which an effective bacterial isolate (s) or microbial consortium capable of degrading xenobiotics is administered to contaminated sites (Gentry et al 2004). The number of petroleum-degrading microbial isolates available for bioaugmentation is increasing (Van Hamme et al 2003;Singer et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bioaugmentation is a promising and low-cost bioremediation method in which an effective bacterial isolate (s) or microbial consortium capable of degrading xenobiotics is administered to contaminated sites (Gentry et al 2004). The number of petroleum-degrading microbial isolates available for bioaugmentation is increasing (Van Hamme et al 2003;Singer et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the soil environment is very complicated and the degrading ability of exogenously added microorganisms tends to be affected by the physicochemical and biological features of the soil environment. Sometimes, the administration of petroleum-degrading microorganisms leads to a failure of bioaugmentation (Vogel 1996;Gentry et al 2004). The two bioremediation treatments can be performed ex situ and in situ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology can be defined as the biologically catalyzed treatment of organic contaminants and can be used in different methodologies such as bioaugmentation (BA) and biostimulation (BS) (Moliterni et al 2012). BA uses an inoculated microbiota that has special affinity for the target contaminant (Gentry et al 2004); BS, the most usual, aims the enhancement of the activity of the autochthonous microorganisms by adjustment of the operating conditions that affect the bioremediation process the most, namely pH and moisture content (Moliterni et al 2012). There are several works proving the success of these two methodologies, such as in the treatment using BS of a mazut-contaminated soil (Beskoski et al 2011) or a hydrocarbon-contaminated subsoil of a metalworking plant (Menendez-Vega et al 2007), and the degradation of chlorpyrifos in soil through plasmid-mediated bioaugmentation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may sometimes involved addition of genetically engineered microorganisms suited for biodegradation of the hydrocarbon contaminants into the contaminated soil. Bioaugmentation is a promising and low-cost bioremediation strategy in which an effective bacterial isolate(s) or microbial consortium capable of degrading xenobiotics is administered to contaminated sites (Gentry et al, 2004). Successful bioremediation of soil contaminated with hydrocarbon sources through bioaugmentation has been reported by various authors.…”
Section: Bioaugmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil environment is very complicated and the degrading ability of exogenously added microorganisms tends to be affected by the physicochemical and biological features of the soil environment. Sometimes, the administration of petroleum degrading microorganisms leads to a failure of bioaugmentation (Vogel 1996;Gentry et al, 2004). Bioaugmentation is not always an effective solution for remediation of contaminated soil because in some cases laboratory strains of microorganisms rarely grow and biodegrade xenobiotics compared to the indigenous microbes (Thieman and Palladino 2009).…”
Section: Bioaugmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%