1989
DOI: 10.1109/43.24881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches in a 3-D one-carrier device solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carrier variables are generally preferred to the Slotboom variables since they have better numerical behavior. However, one can now go a step further and look for maps similar to (4.28) defining variables with an even better numerical behavior; for details, see [15].…”
Section: Existence and Computation Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The carrier variables are generally preferred to the Slotboom variables since they have better numerical behavior. However, one can now go a step further and look for maps similar to (4.28) defining variables with an even better numerical behavior; for details, see [15].…”
Section: Existence and Computation Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second approach uses the Newton or coupled algorithm and solves at each step of an iterative Newton-Raphson algorithm the three linearized PDEs of (1.1) simultaneously. For a discussion of when the coupled or the uncoupled algorithm is preferred, we refer to [15]. Since the uncoupled algorithm can be viewed as a special case of the coupled algorithm, where the off-diagonal field blocks of the Jacobi matrix are set to zero, we present the coupled solution algorithm for the carrier variables here without considering boundary conditions.…”
Section: Existence and Computation Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [ 13, a formula for a was presented which combines the modification made using GGL with the original a of unity. Through a slight rearrangement of the terms and subtraction of one from it, it can be shown that the modification coefficient to %, ha,,, introduced by GGL can be expressed as -1 D@"v (in deriving these matrix blocks, the independent variable for the continuity equations are the scaled Slotboom variables, see [2]). Interestingly, this scheme is essentially the same as one of the schemes used in [4] where it was rated as somewhat effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A block matrix formulation for MSP was presented in [2], it is therefore instructive to find a similar one for GGL. In [ 13, a formula for a was presented which combines the modification made using GGL with the original a of unity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%