2001
DOI: 10.1108/13632540210807008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approaches to communication management for transformation and change in organisations

Abstract: She is currently completing her PhD at the University of Pretoria in South Africa on the role of relationship management in change and transformation with specific reference to postmodern approaches to management. She does regular training and consulting work in this area. Miia Jaatinen received a doctoral degree in communication from the University of Helsinki in 1999. She continues her academic work as a docent at the University of Jyva¨skyla¨, Finland. Miia is a senior consultant at Eera Finland, a GCI Grou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(A reviewer wrote, "Significantly, the main problem usually attributed to systems theory is that it makes a nice story … but doesn't seem to generate any research results".) This argument implies that scholars should (Contractor et al, 1997;Cottone, 1993;Murphy, 1996;Perrow, 1972Perrow, , 1984Seeger, 2002;Stroh and Jaatinen, 2001) and health communication (Witte et al, 1996) have recognized the appropriateness of the chaos paradigm for communication research. Seeger, Sellnow, and Ulmer (1998) have pointed out the suitability of chaos theory for "macroscopic investigation of organizational crisis" (269).…”
Section: Pragmatic Applications Of 'New' Sciencementioning
confidence: 92%
“…(A reviewer wrote, "Significantly, the main problem usually attributed to systems theory is that it makes a nice story … but doesn't seem to generate any research results".) This argument implies that scholars should (Contractor et al, 1997;Cottone, 1993;Murphy, 1996;Perrow, 1972Perrow, , 1984Seeger, 2002;Stroh and Jaatinen, 2001) and health communication (Witte et al, 1996) have recognized the appropriateness of the chaos paradigm for communication research. Seeger, Sellnow, and Ulmer (1998) have pointed out the suitability of chaos theory for "macroscopic investigation of organizational crisis" (269).…”
Section: Pragmatic Applications Of 'New' Sciencementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Messages about change should address the need for it to improve the organization's performance, that it has the support of organizational leadership, and how it benefits the individuals in addition to the organization [Campbell, Carmichael and Naidoo, 2015]. Communication should be two-way and focus on relationship-building to navigate change more effectively within an organization [Ströh and Jaatinen, 2002].…”
Section: Receptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam konteks hubungan, untuk bisa menjadi public-centric, sebuah perusahaan harus mampu memaksimalkan fungsi kecerdasannya. Suatu kecerdasan kolektif yang terstruktur dalam perusahaan yang dibangun dengan budaya organisasi yang unggul, yang terbentuk dari nilainilai dasar yang superior, semangat kerja yang tinggi, dan sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas (Ströh & Jaatinen, 2001). Sebagai contoh, Mercedes Benz sebagai produser mobil yang menjual "kemewahan, eleganitas dan status sosial" memahami benar arti jualannya dan seperti apa makna produknya yang terbentuk dalam kehidupan masyarakat, tanpa harus meninggalkan tradisi atas penemuan-penemuan baru yang mampu mewarnai perubahan dunia dalam hal teknologi mesin, desain dan kompleksitas fitur-fitur yang melekat lainnya.…”
Section: Gambar 2 Model System-centricunclassified