2008
DOI: 10.1002/ima.20143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New brain atlas—Mapping the human brain in vivo with 7.0 T MRI and comparison with postmortem histology: Will these images change modern medicine?

Abstract: Human brain imaging with magnetic resonance at 7.0 Tesla (T) can reveal the brain's architecture with resolution equivalent to that obtained from thin slices in vitro. In vivo images can provide tissue type identification with a greater clarity than that available in vitro without special stains. The coil design is an 8 or 12 channel phased array antenna tuned for 7.0T. The individual coils are arranged 8 or 12 loops in a ''crown'' configuration. Image acquisition is 6 minutes for 15 slices of 2 mm thickness w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 T2*-weighted MRI provides excellent contrast in the midbrain due to its high iron content. [24][25][26] Previous magnetic resonance work has focused mostly on localizing and measuring characteristics of the whole SN [26][27][28] or distinguishing the SNpc and SNpr, 28,29 although there has been some inconsistency in the definition of boundaries and subareas of the SN in Figure 2 Nigrosome 1 in vivo in iron-(T2*-weighted) and neuromelanin-(MT-T1-weighted) sensitive 7 T MRI Example of 2 coregistered, high-resolution, in vivo images of a healthy control (HC) (49 years old) shows the substantia nigra and nigrosome 1 (white arrows). In the T2*-weighted image (left, 0.3 3 0.3 3 0.3 mm 3 voxels), the nigrosome is hyperintense due to its low iron content; in the MT-T1-weighted sequence (right, 0.6 3 0.6 3 0.6 mm 3 voxels), the nigrosome is hyperintense due to its high neuromelanin content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 T2*-weighted MRI provides excellent contrast in the midbrain due to its high iron content. [24][25][26] Previous magnetic resonance work has focused mostly on localizing and measuring characteristics of the whole SN [26][27][28] or distinguishing the SNpc and SNpr, 28,29 although there has been some inconsistency in the definition of boundaries and subareas of the SN in Figure 2 Nigrosome 1 in vivo in iron-(T2*-weighted) and neuromelanin-(MT-T1-weighted) sensitive 7 T MRI Example of 2 coregistered, high-resolution, in vivo images of a healthy control (HC) (49 years old) shows the substantia nigra and nigrosome 1 (white arrows). In the T2*-weighted image (left, 0.3 3 0.3 3 0.3 mm 3 voxels), the nigrosome is hyperintense due to its low iron content; in the MT-T1-weighted sequence (right, 0.6 3 0.6 3 0.6 mm 3 voxels), the nigrosome is hyperintense due to its high neuromelanin content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7(a) for comparison. As demonstrated in [69], 7.0-tesla MR image can reveal the brains’ architecture with resolution equivalent to that obtained from thin slices in vitro . Thus, researchers are able to observe clearly the fine brain structures in µm unit, which was only possible with in vitro imaging in the past.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 7.0 T MR scanner (Cho et al, 2010) enables achieving the high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as well as the dramatically increased contrast and resolution compared to 3.0 T images. As demonstrated in Cho et al (2008), 7.0 T image can clearly reveal the fine in vivo brain structures, with equivalent resolution to that obtained from the sectional slices by in vitro histological imaging. Thus, 7.0 T imaging technique can trigger the innovative development in hippocampus analysis for clinical studies due to its high capability of discovering the μm-level morphological patterns of human brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The main reasons include 1) more severe intensity inhomogeneity in the 7.0 T images compared to 1.5 T or 3.0 T images; 2) high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) which brings forth plenty of anatomical details at the expense of troublesome image noise; and 3) incomplete brain volume (i.e., only a segment of the brain is scanned) due to practical issues such as the trade-off between acquisition time and SNR. Accordingly, no automatic hippocampus segmentation methods have been developed for 7.0 T images, except some manual or semi-automatic methods (Cho et al, 2008, 2010; Yushkevich et al, 2009). Although automatic segmentation method for hippocampal subfields (e.g., cornu ammonis fields 1–3, dentate gyrus, and subiculum) for 4.0 T MR image has been developed in Yushkevich et al (2010), it can only deal with the subfields and additionally requires the manually labeled hippocampus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%