2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24129935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cases and Mutations in SEC23B Gene Causing Congenital Dyserythropoietic Anemia Type II

Abstract: Congenital dyserythropoietic anemia type II (CDA II) is an inherited autosomal recessive blood disorder which belongs to the wide group of ineffective erythropoiesis conditions. It is characterized by mild to severe normocytic anemia, jaundice, and splenomegaly owing to the hemolytic component. This often leads to liver iron overload and gallstones. CDA II is caused by biallelic mutations in the SEC23B gene. In this study, we report 9 new CDA II cases and identify 16 pathogenic variants, 6 of which are novel. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of CDA type II casesshow missense mutations followed by nonsense, frameshift, splice site, intronic, and small indel mutations. The compound heterozygosity for missense andnonsensemutationsproduces moredeleteriouseffects [6]. Inourcase, although the symptoms started at an early age, thediagnosis was made at the age of 30 years, which is concordant with the study done on 101 CDA type II patients, where the mean age of diagnosis was 37 years [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The majority of CDA type II casesshow missense mutations followed by nonsense, frameshift, splice site, intronic, and small indel mutations. The compound heterozygosity for missense andnonsensemutationsproduces moredeleteriouseffects [6]. Inourcase, although the symptoms started at an early age, thediagnosis was made at the age of 30 years, which is concordant with the study done on 101 CDA type II patients, where the mean age of diagnosis was 37 years [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%