1983
DOI: 10.3109/00016348309154215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Cases of Irregular Blood Group Antibodies Other Than Anti‐D in Pregnancy

Abstract: The frequency of irregular blood group antibodies detected for the first time in pregnant women during the period 1975-80 has been examined. Whereas Rh(D)-negative gravidae in Norway are examined immuno-hematologically three times during pregnancy, Rh(D)-positive women are tested once only, usually early in pregnancy. Nevertheless, about one-third of the new cases of immunization within the Rh system were found in the Rh-positive women. In the latter, anti-E and anti-c were the Rh antibodies most frequently en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
24
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over a 1-year period (1993), anti-M was the third most commonly encountered non-Rh antibody in antenatal patients, with an incidence of 2.0% for newly identified antibodies, and 1.33% of all samples with antibodies (excluding Rh anti bodies). These findings are similar to those of Komstad [6], as he chose not to include anti-Lewis antibodies in his sur vey and found anti-Kell to be the most frequently detected non-Rh antibody, with anti-M the second most frequent, followed by anti-Fya. Of the 29 anti-M antibodies detected during 1993 by Mersey Blood Services only the example of anti-M discussed here caused HDN, and so it would seem that while it is a common antibody, our data would endorse that it is usually a non-clinically important antibody.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over a 1-year period (1993), anti-M was the third most commonly encountered non-Rh antibody in antenatal patients, with an incidence of 2.0% for newly identified antibodies, and 1.33% of all samples with antibodies (excluding Rh anti bodies). These findings are similar to those of Komstad [6], as he chose not to include anti-Lewis antibodies in his sur vey and found anti-Kell to be the most frequently detected non-Rh antibody, with anti-M the second most frequent, followed by anti-Fya. Of the 29 anti-M antibodies detected during 1993 by Mersey Blood Services only the example of anti-M discussed here caused HDN, and so it would seem that while it is a common antibody, our data would endorse that it is usually a non-clinically important antibody.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Komstad [6] found anti-M to be the second commonest non-Rh antibody (after anti-Kell) in Norway between 1975 and 1980, though no cases of HDN occurred. Beal [7], performing a similar survey in South Australia between 1973 and 1978 found only one example of anti-M which was also not found to be associated with HDN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The Rh antigen system is mainly composed of the antigens C, c, D, E, and e. The c antigen is a common cause of isoimmunization. 4 -14 Its relative ability to cause clinically significant hemolytic disease of the newborn, however, has been the focus of debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are the most frequently encountered antibodies of the MNS blood group system 6. Anti-M antibodies are rarely associated with intrauterine deaths/non-immune hydrops or haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) 7. The index case is a rare association of anti-M antibodies with fetal hydrops and severe neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia and only few cases have been reported 2 3 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%