2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New constraints on direct collapse black hole formation in the early Universe

Abstract: Direct collapse black holes (DCBH) have been proposed as a solution to the challenge of assembling supermassive black holes by z > 6 to explain the bright quasars observed at this epoch. The formation of a DCBH seed with M BH ∼ 10 4−5 M ⊙ requires a pristine atomiccooling halo to be illuminated by an external radiation field that is sufficiently strong to entirely suppress H 2 cooling in the halo. Many previous studies have attempted to constrain the critical specific intensity that is likely required to suppr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At low densities the gas evolves adiabatically, leading to the scaling R detach ∝ n 3/2 , whereas at higher densities the scaling is better approximated assuming the gas is isothermal, leading to the scaling R detach ∝ n 31/18 . Note that, in all cases, the photodetachment rate rises above the critical rate of ∼ 10 −5 s −1 found in calculations assuming a constant background rate and a weak H 2 -dissociating radiation field by Agarwal et al (2016a). tion, molecular cooling is less effective with higher levels of the background radiation field. However, in all cases shown here the gas is still able to cool to < ∼ 10 3 K when H − detachment is not included in the calculation.…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At low densities the gas evolves adiabatically, leading to the scaling R detach ∝ n 3/2 , whereas at higher densities the scaling is better approximated assuming the gas is isothermal, leading to the scaling R detach ∝ n 31/18 . Note that, in all cases, the photodetachment rate rises above the critical rate of ∼ 10 −5 s −1 found in calculations assuming a constant background rate and a weak H 2 -dissociating radiation field by Agarwal et al (2016a). tion, molecular cooling is less effective with higher levels of the background radiation field. However, in all cases shown here the gas is still able to cool to < ∼ 10 3 K when H − detachment is not included in the calculation.…”
Section: Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Omukai et al 2005Omukai et al , 2008Schleicher et al 2010;Agarwal et al 2016a). The model assumes that the density of the primordial gas increases on the free-fall timescale, and the non-equilibrium chemical and thermal evolution of the collapsing gas is calculated.…”
Section: Feedback From Lyman α Cooling Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We estimate this abundance by extrapolating the fraction of pristine haloes that are exposed to a critically high LW flux (Dijkstra et al 2014). As a first order estimate, using the peak of the critical flux distribution from Agarwal et al (2016) to estimate the number of viable hosts for DCBH formation and assembly, in the 800 arcmin 2 area of the CANDELS fields which corresponds to a ∼ 9 × 10 −3 Gpc 3 volume, we expect about a hundred potential DCBH formation sites. However, not all these sources will be DCBHs or be in the OBG stage and be detectable by Chandra since only a fraction of them are expected to be active.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%