2019
DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2018.00108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Crosslinked Hyaluronan Gel, Intrauterine Device, or Both for the Prevention of Intrauterine Adhesions

Abstract: Background and Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 3 different techniques for prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in patients with moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions. Short-term assisted reproductive outcomes were also compared. Study Design: Total of 72 cases were randomized to Lippes loop intrauterine device (IUD) only, IUD plus a new crosslinked hyaluronan (NCH) gel, or NCH gel only following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. All c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study reported that these three methods are of similar efficacy in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for moderate-to-severe IUAs. [ 25 ] Another study reported that for moderate-to-severe IUAs, HA gel combined with IUD may be an alternative approach for reducing adhesion recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. [ 21 ] However, another study showed that the insertion of IUD is more effective than the use of HA in the prevention of IUA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study reported that these three methods are of similar efficacy in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for moderate-to-severe IUAs. [ 25 ] Another study reported that for moderate-to-severe IUAs, HA gel combined with IUD may be an alternative approach for reducing adhesion recurrence after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. [ 21 ] However, another study showed that the insertion of IUD is more effective than the use of HA in the prevention of IUA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We feel that the recurrent rate, defined by de novo adhesion formation, is the most optimal outcome for evaluating the prevention of re-adhesions. Another study conducted by Pabuçcu et al suggested that the combination of HA gel and IUD provides a non-significant improvement in post-treatment AFS score but a significant enhancement in EMT after treatment 26 . In this trial, the authors excluded patients with mild adhesions before treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite much research investigating HA gel and IUD following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, there have only been a few studies that have compared the effectiveness of the combination of them with HA gel alone and IUD alone 26,27 . Our study's results are in contrast with a previous randomized controlled trial of 89 patients 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al ( Lin et al, 2013 ) found that the insertion of an intrauterine balloon or IUD was more effective than the use of HA gel alone in the prevention of IUA reformation. Furthermore, Pabuçcu et al ( Pabuçcu et al, 2019 ) found that endometrial thickness was significantly enhanced when applying a new crosslinked hyaluronan gel with an IUD after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Although many studies have shown that an IUD combined with hydrogels can reduce IUA recurrence, in some cases the clinical pregnancy rate of these patients is not improved.…”
Section: The Application Of Bioactive Hydrogels In Iuamentioning
confidence: 99%