2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New data for the Early Upper Paleolithic of Kostenki (Russia)

Abstract: Several questions remain regarding the timing and nature of the Neanderthal-anatomically modern human (AMH) transition in Europe. The situation in Eastern Europe is generally less clear due to the relatively few sites and a dearth of reliable radiocarbon dates. Claims have been made for both notably early AMH and notably late Neanderthal presence, as well as for early AMH (Aurignacian) dispersal into the region from Central/Western Europe. The Kostenki-Borshchevo complex (European Russia) of Early Upper Paleol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The picture is convoluted further by the fact that the makers of other transitional industries from north-western, central and south-eastern Europe and Russia, such as the Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician (LRJ), Bohunician, Bachokirian, Szeletian and Streleskayan remain unknown (Dinnis et al, 2019). They could feasibly be made by late Neanderthals or H. sapiens (Flas, 2011;Villa and Roebroeks, 2014;Hublin, 2015).…”
Section: Transitional Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The picture is convoluted further by the fact that the makers of other transitional industries from north-western, central and south-eastern Europe and Russia, such as the Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician (LRJ), Bohunician, Bachokirian, Szeletian and Streleskayan remain unknown (Dinnis et al, 2019). They could feasibly be made by late Neanderthals or H. sapiens (Flas, 2011;Villa and Roebroeks, 2014;Hublin, 2015).…”
Section: Transitional Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plots of lithic artifacts along with radiocarbon-dated bone samples from Lapa do Picareiro: (A) X-axis profile of the cave, perpendicular to the central axis, (B) Y-axis profile of the cave, lengthwise from front to back.∼41.9 to 41.1 ka cal BP (terminus post quem or earliest possible date) and 39.4 to 38.1 ka cal BP (terminus ante quem or latest possible date). Thus, the assemblage falls within most of the Proto-Aurignacian and entirely within the Early-Aurignacian time frame in Europe(11,47,48). The artifact deposition likely took place during the Greenland Stadial (GS)-9 climate…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread application of the system originally developed for Aquitanian material has facilitated the recognition of broad-scale similarity among early and mid Upper Palaeolithic assemblages across Europe. The distribution of assemblages described as Aurignacian and Gravettian, for example, extends across the entire continent from Iberia to Russia (Teyssandier 2006;Noiret 2013;Dinnis et al 2019). The situation is rather different for the late Upper Palaeolithic, with Epigravettian assemblages described in the east and south of Europe, and Badegoulian and Magdalenian assemblages in the west (Maier 2015;Naudinot et al 2017).…”
Section: Contemporary Cultural Taxonomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%