2009 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ical.2009.5262834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New delay-dependent criteria for stability and stabilization of uncertain singular systems with time delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the delay is time invariant. The maximum allowed τ, obtained by the criteria in 3, 5–8, 10–13, 15, 35, 37 and Corollary 4.1 of this paper, is shown in Table I. The numerical results shown in Table I illustrate that the stability criterion in Corollary 4.1 gives higher upper bound on the delay than 3, 5, 6, 11–13, 37, and has same upper bound with 7, 8, 10, 15, 35, 36.…”
Section: Numerical Examples and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the delay is time invariant. The maximum allowed τ, obtained by the criteria in 3, 5–8, 10–13, 15, 35, 37 and Corollary 4.1 of this paper, is shown in Table I. The numerical results shown in Table I illustrate that the stability criterion in Corollary 4.1 gives higher upper bound on the delay than 3, 5, 6, 11–13, 37, and has same upper bound with 7, 8, 10, 15, 35, 36.…”
Section: Numerical Examples and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The maximum allowed , obtained by the criteria in [3, 5-8, 10-13, 15, 35, 37] and Corollary 4.1 of this paper, is shown in Table I. The numerical results shown in Table I illustrate that the stability criterion in Corollary 4.1 gives higher upper bound on the delay than [3,5,6,[11][12][13]37], and has same upper bound with [7,8,10,15,35,36]. On the other hand, the stability criterion in Corollary 4.1 when L = 0 involves fewer number of variables than those in [3, 6, 10-13, 15, 35], and has the same number of variables with those in [7,8,37].…”
Section: Example 51mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the study of delay-dependent stability for singular time-delay systems has received increasing attention. In terms of LMI approach, several delay-dependent stability criteria were given in [9,10,11,12]. [9,10] investigated the delay-dependent robust stabilization problem for uncertain singular time-delay systems by using model transformation and bounding technique for cross-terms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] investigated the delay-dependent robust stabilization problem for uncertain singular time-delay systems by using model transformation and bounding technique for cross-terms. [11,12] also discussed the problem, and neither model transformation nor bounding technique for cross-terms is needed in the development of the results. By employing the delay decomposition approach, [13] established a delay-dependent criterion for singular time-delay systems to be regular, impulse free and asymptotically stable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%