2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New delayed neutron group constants and covariances for LWR core applications, combining summation calculations and integral experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Priors were centred on TRIPOLI-4 computed values and their distribution was Gaussian. Their standard deviation, σ, was taken from recent work on nuclear data [5][6]. Note that prior knowledge information is helpful to converge to a physical solution and that 𝜆 𝑖 are fixed in JEFF3.1.1.…”
Section: Computational Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priors were centred on TRIPOLI-4 computed values and their distribution was Gaussian. Their standard deviation, σ, was taken from recent work on nuclear data [5][6]. Note that prior knowledge information is helpful to converge to a physical solution and that 𝜆 𝑖 are fixed in JEFF3.1.1.…”
Section: Computational Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in code development for reactor physics simulations may also made the experimental modulation studies less attractive in inferring the core parameters. Starting from 2000, several modulation studies with a focus on the determination of kinetic parameters, especially for delayed neutron parameters, are found in the literature [13][14][15][52][53][54]. The kinetic parameter evaluations in major nuclear data libraries rely essentially on experimental data, and the impact of undocumented uncertainty and experimental conditions of various experiments are difficult to quantify.…”
Section: After 1980mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.4. ZPTF phase measured in the MINERVE reactor[54] compared with equivalent results with the kinetic parameters from Brady & England (ENDF/B-VIII.0β4[56]), Keepin 6-group (JENDL-4.0[57]) and Keepin 8-group expanded (JEFF-3.3[58]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular feature of the RTF of low power reactors, namely the Zero-Power reactor Transfer Function (ZPTF), is that it is only dependent on the kinetic behavior of prompt and delayed neutron population produced in the fission chain reaction. While an extensive amount of computational work were conducted to improve the modeling of reactor kinetics, recent studies [2][3][4] have shown the potential of an alternative experimental approach, through in-core reactivity modulation, towards the better understanding of the underlying physical phenomena. In this context, the PISTIL device (Periodic reactivity Injection System Transients Induced Locally) was developed by CEA in the framework of a collaboration between CEA and EPFL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%