2019
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1603556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New dynamics of rent gap formation in New York City rent-regulated housing: privatization, financialization, and uneven development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Financed by institutional investors like corporations, pension funds, and insurance companies, real estate funds have diversified investors’ existing holdings with a global portfolio of properties, generating returns from monthly cash flows and capital gains from property sales (Van Loon and Aalbers ). Elsewhere, there is evidence that price appreciation practices once confined to the single‐family home market (Smith ), specifically landowners “flipping” distressed properties in order to capture a rent gap, are scaling upwards to institutional investors and outwards towards multifamily homes (Slater ; Teresa ).…”
Section: Rent Beyond the Rent Gap In The Era Of Shareholder Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Financed by institutional investors like corporations, pension funds, and insurance companies, real estate funds have diversified investors’ existing holdings with a global portfolio of properties, generating returns from monthly cash flows and capital gains from property sales (Van Loon and Aalbers ). Elsewhere, there is evidence that price appreciation practices once confined to the single‐family home market (Smith ), specifically landowners “flipping” distressed properties in order to capture a rent gap, are scaling upwards to institutional investors and outwards towards multifamily homes (Slater ; Teresa ).…”
Section: Rent Beyond the Rent Gap In The Era Of Shareholder Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms purchase buildings on the assumption that rents can be doubled, tripled, or more." More recent empirical work from Teresa (2019), Sims (2016), and August (2020) depict gentrification as a process driven by real estate investment in the current moment of financialization. Separately, these three studies find that real estate investment in contemporary New York City, Los Angeles, California, and Toronto is predicated on the replacement of current low-income tenants with higher paying households.…”
Section: Financialization Of Multifamily Rental Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separately, these three studies find that real estate investment in contemporary New York City, Los Angeles, California, and Toronto is predicated on the replacement of current low-income tenants with higher paying households. This research across several cities has shown that rising investor purchases of multifamily properties correspond with rising rents, physical displacement, and neighborhood change (Fields & Uffer, 2016;JCHS, 2019;Teresa, 2019). This pattern of investment is entwined with real estate finance as, nationally, cap rates for apartment buildings have been declining, indicating that prices have been rising relative to net operating income, that rents continue to rise, and that leverage continues to increase (JCHS, 2020).…”
Section: Financialization Of Multifamily Rental Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InterRent's repositioning strategy represents a clear effort to profit from rent gaps (Smith, 1996). However, as will become clear, this strategy is not only aimed at revalorizing a rent gap created by divestment and consequentially a lower capitalized rent; it also exemplifies a key cause of financialized gentrification, namely—as identified by Teresa (2019)—a rent gap formed by exploiting the regulatory, financial and geographical possibilities of an ‘increased potential rent’.…”
Section: Technical Class Composition and Financialized Gentrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%