Can social assistance (with a child lens) help in reducing urban poverty in Ghana? Evidence, challenges and way forward, Innocenti Working Paper 2018-16, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.The Office of Research -Innocenti is UNICEF's dedicated research centre. It undertakes research on emerging or current issues in order to inform the strategic directions, policies and programmes of UNICEF and its partners, shape global debates on child rights and development, and inform the global research and policy agenda for all children, and particularly for the most vulnerable.Publications produced by the Office are contributions to a global debate on children and may not necessarily reflect UNICEF policies or approaches. The views expressed are those of the authors.The Office of Research -Innocenti receives financial support from the Government of Italy, while funding for specific projects is also provided by other governments, international institutions and private sources, including UNICEF National Committees.For further information and to download or order this and other publications, please visit the website at www.unicef-irc.org.
ABSTRACTExperience with urban social assistance programmes is still limited, and fewer poor households are reached by social protection in urban than in rural areas. Many urban programmes are extensions or duplicates of rural programmes, but urban-sensitive social protection needs to reflect the distinct vulnerabilities of the urban poor. Applying a child lens requires identifying and addressing the specific risks and multiple deprivations that are experienced by half of urban children in developing countries (e.g. child labour, streetism, crime). The New Urban Agenda emphasizes a need for social protection to reach informal workers, to facilitate access to essential public services, and to realise the right to adequate housing for all. Costs of living are higher in urban areas, where the poor must pay for utilities and services, such as rent, transport and water, that are cheaper or free in rural villages. Instead of producing food for home consumption, urban residents depend on market purchases and are vulnerable to price inflation.Designing social assistance for urban contexts faces challenges such as accurately targeting the poor (given the spatial geography of urban poverty) and setting appropriate payment levels (given the high and variable costs of urban living). Geographic targeting (e.g. informal settlements), proxy means testing (if urban-sensitive) and categorical targeting (e.g. street children) are popular mechanisms in urban areas, but community-based targeting is often inappropriate (because of urban social fragmentation) while self-targeting can be unethical (e.g. where wages below market rates are paid in public works projects) and might contradict rights-based approaches. As for payments, programmes such as the Minimum Living Standard Guarantee in China pay benefits that are higher in urban areas, where needs and resources are greater. To avoid perceptions of inequity, a d...