2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2016.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New evidence for diverse secondary burial practices in Iron Age Britain: A histological case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
57
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of cementum loss has been evaluated using two histological indexes: one exclusively considering microbial action: the Oxford histological index modified (OHIm) originally developed for bone tissue by Hedges, Millard, and Pike (), adapted by Millard () and applied in numerous archeological publications (Booth, Chamberlain, & Pearson, ; Booth & Madgwick, ; Jans, Nielsen‐Marsh, Smith, Collins, & Kars, ; Smith et al, ), forensic anthropology (Jans, ), paleontology (Grine, Bromage, Daegling, Burr, & Brain, ), or experimental taphonomy (Kontopoulos, Nystrom, & White, ); the other considering microbial action and other types of physical and chemical alterations such as infiltrations or fractures: the general histological index modified (GHIm) originally developed for bone tissue by Hollund et al (). These modified indexes were assigned by the same operator and range from 0 to 5 as follow:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of cementum loss has been evaluated using two histological indexes: one exclusively considering microbial action: the Oxford histological index modified (OHIm) originally developed for bone tissue by Hedges, Millard, and Pike (), adapted by Millard () and applied in numerous archeological publications (Booth, Chamberlain, & Pearson, ; Booth & Madgwick, ; Jans, Nielsen‐Marsh, Smith, Collins, & Kars, ; Smith et al, ), forensic anthropology (Jans, ), paleontology (Grine, Bromage, Daegling, Burr, & Brain, ), or experimental taphonomy (Kontopoulos, Nystrom, & White, ); the other considering microbial action and other types of physical and chemical alterations such as infiltrations or fractures: the general histological index modified (GHIm) originally developed for bone tissue by Hollund et al (). These modified indexes were assigned by the same operator and range from 0 to 5 as follow:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As only a limited number of studies has ever examined bone diagenesis in commingled, disarticulated secondary burials (e.g., Booth and Madgwick 2016), the aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of bone diagenesis in a secondary burial environment. Histological (light microscopy), physical (FTIR-ATR), and biochemical (collagen) analyses of human and animal bones were undertaken in order to explore any differences in the diagenetic changes occurred in those commingled archaeological bones.…”
Section: The Mycenaean Secondary Burial In Kastroulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque la Arqueología ha demostrado repetidamente su competencia para acreditar, desde diferentes ópticas, conductas de estas características en la Prehistoria Reciente del Viejo Mundo (Larsson, 2003;Brück, 2006: 80-85;Kólar, 2012;Booth y Madgwick, 2016), en nuestro caso topamos todavía con muchas dificultades a la hora de rastrear paso a paso la secuencia del mencionado ritual de las dobles exequias. Pero ello no impide que, a partir de los datos de que se dispone, creamos posible rastrear en diferentes yacimientos de la Cuenca del Duero las distintas fases que conformarían una secuencia de funerales dobles:…”
Section: Secuenciaunclassified