2011
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2010.0462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New fault zone identification scheme for busbar using support vector machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to many literatures, it has been observed by the authors that Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel is the first choice for training as it nonlinearly maps samples into higher dimensional space most effectively among all types of kernels used [24].…”
Section: Svm Based Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to many literatures, it has been observed by the authors that Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel is the first choice for training as it nonlinearly maps samples into higher dimensional space most effectively among all types of kernels used [24].…”
Section: Svm Based Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the effect of location can be improved when combining with other techniques like wavelet transformer, ANN, genetic algorithm, etc. Other techniques such as Zero-Mode transient method, Injection method, Bayesian network method, were proposed in [18][19][20][21] as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, [12] presented a novel wavelet-transform-based directional algorithm for busbar protection, where only the high-frequency details at the first level were employed. Recently, a new SVM based fault zone identification scheme for busbar was presented [13]. This scheme could identify faults accurately, yet the methodology needed one cycle post-fault current signals of all the lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, [14] combined several protection principles and measuring techniques into a scheme with minimum CT performance requirements, which enhanced the performance of busbar protection to some extent. However, due to the deficiency of neglecting the impacts of the transition resistance and fault initial angle [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the reliability of traditional transient protection methods cannot be guaranteed whilst their performance are not stable enough, thus limiting their wide utilization in reality. Overall, all these methods need information of all lines connected to the busbar, which may lead to the complexity of such methods and the poor reliability of the protection schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%