“…This school of thought attributes Pliocene initiation of the SRS (Li et al., 1998; SSB, 1988; Xu & Ma, 1992; Xu et al., 1993) to the northward expansion of the Tibetan Plateau during India‐Eurasia collision (e.g., Molnar & Tapponnier, 1977; Peltzer et al., 1985; Tapponnier et al., 1982). However, this model is at odds with several observations, including (1) basal deposits in the southern SRS (i.e., Weihe, Yuncheng, and Linfen Basins) that are of middle Eocene in age (Bellier et al., 1988; Fan et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2019); (2) multiphase planation surfaces preserved on rift shoulders (Lüliang Shan and Taihang Shan mountains) which suggest multiple cycles of rapid uplift and tectonic quiescence (Wu et al., 2017); (3) multiple episodes of accelerated exhumation during the Eocene‐Early Oligocene and Miocene‐Quaternary, as revealed by low‐temperature thermochronology ages from the Wutai Shan of the northern SRS (Cao et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2019; Clinkscales et al., 2020; Qing et al., 2008) and the North Qinling mountains of the southern SRS (Chen et al., 2015; Heberer et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2013); and (4) kinematic reorganization of deformation along the present‐day northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, from widespread extension in the Eocene to contraction in the Late Miocene (Fan et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2013, 2016). These observations suggest that the timing of initial extension along the SRS and the subsequent space‐time patterns of deformation may be more complex than previously thought.…”